Živković Samardžić advises Olvi Oyj on Serbian law aspects of the acquisition of Banja Luka Brewery
Tuesday, 16 September 2025
- Published in Deals and Cases
The Schrems II Case and its impact on the personal data transfer between EU and Non-EU countries
Friday, 06 May 2022
- Published in Client Updates
Topic: Closing a Company in Liquidation Procedure Through Bankruptcy
Friday, 16 July 2021
- Published in Client Updates
Personal data protection – stance and opinions of the Commissioner Type: Microsoft Word Document
Wednesday, 17 February 2021
- Published in Publications
Insurance-based investment products – review of some legal issues
Tuesday, 02 February 2021
Since enactment of the new Insurance Law in 2015, insurance undertakings in Serbia are provided with opportunity to offer to their clients insurance products where sum of insurance is wholly or partially exposed to market fluctuations and policyholders assumes investment risk. Such products – sometimes referred to as „unit-linked insurance products“, are collectively known as
- Published in Insights
Market Conduct Regulation in Serbian Insurance Sector
Thursday, 01 October 2020
What is market conduct regulation? Market conduct is second pillar of ongoing regulatory reform in the EU insurance law. While the “macro-economic” quantitative and qualitative prudential requirements are addressed through the rules established by the Solvency II directive, the “micro-economic” conduct risks are addressed through rules established by the Insurance Distribution Directive. Market conduct regulation
- Published in Insights
Živković Samardžić advises Halkbank a.d. Beograd on privacy compliance and records management issues
Tuesday, 27 August 2019
- Published in Deals and Cases
Shift in case-law related to appropriation of encumbered real property
Monday, 12 June 2017
[vc_row][vc_column width=”1/2″][vc_column_text]The 2005 Serbian Law on Hypothec (Official Gazette of the Republic of Serbia, No. 60/2005), introduced the possibility of out-of-court collection and in particular the so-called ‘subsequent agreements’, allowing appropriation of encumbered real property instead of satisfaction of secured claim (Article 27 of the Law on Hypothec), but had its flaws that were severely
- Published in Insights