ZS

  • Services
  • Professionals
  • Insights
  • About Us
  • Careers
  • Contact
  • Regional Coverage

Services

Banking and Finance

Celebrating the first 25 Years of Živković Samardžić. And the best is yet to come

Tuesday, 17 October 2023 by ZS Law

Živković Samardžić celebrates its 25th anniversary. For a quarter of a century, we have been committed to providing exceptional legal services to our clients, which positioned our law firm as one of the leading law firms on the market. Since our beginnings in 1998, when two partners had practice in media, telecoms, insurance litigation, and a few more areas, our legal firm has grown into a full-service practice, counting over 40 lawyers, endorsed with the highest rankings in several practice areas by the world’s leading legal directories and highly respected by the clients, peers and in the community. This milestone is a testament to our dedication and commitment, but it is also a firm foundation for the years to come – and this is only the beginning.

To celebrate this significant jubilee, an event has been organized on October 6th at Barrel House in Belgrade. Živković Samardžić partners, associates, and staff members were joined in their celebrations by alumni, colleagues, and friends from well-respected law offices, business hubs, associations, members of the academia, and executives from a number of our clients, as well as the representatives of the civil society that the firm provided advice to. The sparkle to our celebration was the attendance of our dear colleagues from RIVET:NET, a network that Živković Samardžić is a founding member and that gathers leading independent law firms in the region aimed at providing comprehensive legal support across several jurisdictions.

„Our success is rooted in the trust and confidence our clients have placed in us over the years and the hard work that all our team put into the firm. We will keep servicing our clients with even more passion, integrity, and excellence, and I have no doubt that we will see each other at the celebration of the 50th anniversary “, said Nebojša Samardžič, our founding partner.

Read more
  • Published in Firm News
No Comments

Živković Samardžić and Rivet:net, top-five law firm and regional network by the number of lawyers in Serbia and the entire CEE region, respectively

Wednesday, 04 October 2023 by ZS Law

Recently published 2023 CEE by the Numbers special issue of the CEE Legal Matters magazine, a compilation, and presentation of data about the lawyers at leading law firms of Central and Eastern Europe, recognized Živković Samardžić as a top five law firm in Serbia, by the number of lawyers. 

CEE Legal Matters considered leading law firms to be firms ranked by Chambers & Partners and Legal 500, or part of regional networks that include ranked firms.

As we celebrate Živković Samardžić’s 25th anniversary, we are aware of our position as one of Serbia’s leading and largest full-service independent law firms. However, we were humbled by the fact that our regional network Rivet:net, is recognized as a top-five network, by the number of lawyers, across the entire CEE region. 

We congratulate our friends at other Rivet:net member firms, Bona Fide from North Macedonia, Fatur Menard from Slovenia, Hodaj & Partnersfrom Kosovo, Milanović – Lalić and Suljović from Bosnia and Herzegovina and Vukmir and Associates from Croatia.

The electronic version of the 2023 CEE by the Numbers special issue of the CEE Legal Matters magazine is publicly available here in pdf format. If you would like to receive a hard copy of the magazine, you can subscribe here.

Read more
  • Published in Uncategorized
No Comments

Živković Samardžić Advises on the Sale of HDL Design House to Capgemini Consulting Österreich AG

Thursday, 28 September 2023 by ZS Law

Živković Samardžić, one of Serbia’s leading full-service independent law firms, has advised the shareholders of HDL Design House, a leading independent provider of silicon design and verification services in Europe, on the sale of this company to Capgemini Consulting Österreich AG, a multinational information technology (IT) services and consulting company.

HDL Design House was founded in 2001 and headquartered in Belgrade (Serbia) and it comprises approximately of 300 highly skilled engineers with substantial experience in delivering advanced custom chip designs for multiple industries.

Capgemini is a global leader in partnering with companies to transform and manage their business by harnessing the power of technology. With its strong 55-year heritage and deep industry expertise, Capgemini is trusted by its clients to address the entire breadth of their business needs, from strategy and design to operations, fueled by the fast evolving and innovative world of cloud, data, AI, connectivity, software, digital engineering, and platforms. It is a responsible and diverse organization of 350,000 team members in more than 50 countries. Živković Samardžić team that acted as lead legal counsel to the shareholders of HDL Design House on all aspects of this transaction consisted of Partners Branislav Živković, Uroš Đorđević, Igor Živkovski, Sava Pavlović, and Associate Danka Draško.

Corporate and M&AUroš ĐorđevićIgor ŽivkovskiBranislav ŽivkovićSava PavlovićDanka Draško
Read more
  • Published in Deals and Cases
No Comments

Živković Samardžić secured a victory for B92 at the European Court of Human Rights

Sunday, 10 September 2023 by ZS Law

Kruna Savović, Živković Samardžić Technology, Media and Telecommunications Partner and a Head of Media Litigation, led the Živković Samardžić team that has secured a victory for RADIO BROADCASTING COMPANY B92 AD at the European Court of Human Rights.

The case at hand originated in an application against Serbia (no. 67369/16), concerning the TV news broadcast and an online article published in 2011, naming the Assistant Minister of Health at the time, for whom the officers of the Organised Financial Crime Department’s Anti-Corruption Division of the Serbian Criminal Police Directorate, had a reason to suspect, in the pre-trial proceedings regarding the procurement of AH1N1 vaccines in 2009, was involved in the abuses. According to the TV news broadcast and online article published by B92, the name of the Assistant Minister of Health, along with several others, was omitted from the final criminal complaint that was brought against only three persons. Broadcaster based its reporting on a note filed by the officers of the Anti-Corruption Division informing their superiors on the issue.

In 2012, the Assistant Minister of Health instituted proceedings against the broadcaster in the Belgrade High Court, seeking compensation for non-pecuniary damage, publication of the court’s judgment, and removal of the two articles from the broadcaster’s Internet portal. The Assistant Minister submitted, in particular, that it was not true that she had been suspected of abuse of office, or of anything else, nor had she been removed from the alleged list of suspects because of illicit influence. The Belgrade High Court ruled partly in favor of the Assistant Minister and ordered the broadcaster to pay her RSD 200,000 (approximately EUR 1,750) with statutory interest by way of compensation for non-pecuniary damage, and RSD 113,100 (approximately EUR 990) for costs; and to remove one of the articles from its Internet portal. The Belgrade High Court also ordered the editor-in-chief to publish the judgment. The court found that the broadcaster had not used due diligence and so had not discovered the incompleteness of the information in question. Instead, according to the court, the broadcaster had relied on a document that contained operational findings of the police in pre-trial proceedings and as such did not constitute an official document of a relevant State body.

In 2014, the Belgrade Court of Appeal upheld the first-instance judgment and, in substance, endorsed its reasoning. In 2016, the Constitutional Court dismissed the broadcaster’s constitutional appeal.

In its judgment, the European Court of Human Rights, considered that the domestic courts took a rather limited view when characterizing the suggestion that the names disappeared from the list of suspects because of pressure from the Special Prosecutor on the Ministry of the Interior, as a statement of fact as well, and not as a value judgment for which the official internal note have provided factual basis. The European Court of Human Rights confirmed that even though internal official reports can be an important source for journalists, they cannot release them completely from their obligation to base their publications on sufficient research. However, the Court considered that by attempting to obtain the Assistant Minister’s and the Ministry’s version of events and by publishing the response of the Special Prosecutor’s Office, the broadcaster must be considered to have sought to achieve a balance in its reporting and has complied with its duty of diligence in verifying the authenticity and content of the police note. The Court was satisfied that the applicant company acted in good faith and with the diligence expected of a responsible journalist reporting on a matter of public interest.

The Court emphasized that if the national courts apply an overly rigorous approach to the assessment of journalists’ professional conduct, journalists could be unduly deterred from discharging their function of keeping the public informed. The courts must therefore take into account the likely impact of their rulings not only on the individual cases before them but also on the media in general. Their margin of appreciation is thus circumscribed by the interest of a democratic society in enabling the press to play its vital role in imparting information of serious public concern.

Thus, the European Court of Human Rights unanimously declared that there had been a violation of Article 10 of the Convention and held that the respondent state (Serbia) is to pay the broadcaster EUR 2,740 in respect of pecuniary damage, EUR 2,500 in respect of non-pecuniary damage and EUR 2,400 in respect of costs and expenses.

The original judgment in English language is available here.

You can read how Serbian media commented the judgment here and here.The team acting on behalf of B92 in this case, also included our former associate, Jovan Pjevač. 

Media and TelecommunicationsKruna SavovićTechnology Media and Telecommunications
Read more
  • Published in Deals and Cases
No Comments

Živković Samardžić Advises Samsic on the Acquisition of the Remaining 45% Stake in Samsic STM from the Minority Shareholders

Monday, 24 July 2023 by ZS Law

Živković Samardžić has advised Samsic Holding dejavnost holdingov d.o.o, the Slovenian member of the French Samsic Group, on the acquisition of the remaining 45% stake in Samsic STM d.o.o, Belgrade based facility management, construction and installation services provider, from the two founding shareholders. As a result of the transaction, Samsic became the sole shareholder of this Group’s subsidiary in Serbia.

Founded in 1986 and based in Rennes, France, with 117,000 employees and an annual turnover of EUR 3,45 billion, Samsic is the European leader in facility management. Today, while present in 27 countries in Europe and beyond, Samsic contributes to the performance of its 30,000 customers by offering them customized services, tailored to their specific needs.

Živković Samardžić acted as legal adviser to Samsic on all aspects of the deal, including structuring the transaction, drafting and negotiating of transactional documentation, assisting with the preparation and execution of the closing process and all-encompassing legal advisory regarding post-closing activities.

The Živković Samardžić team that has advised Samsic on this deal consisted of Partner Igor Živkovski and Associate Teodora Milošević.

Corporate and M&AIgor ŽivkovskiTeodora Milošević
Read more
  • Published in Deals and Cases
No Comments

Another Recognition for Živković Samardžić and Igor Živkovski ahead of the Firm’s 25-year Anniversary

Wednesday, 19 July 2023 by ZS Law

We are thrilled to announce that CEE Legal Matters, one of the best known and most respected legal magazines, in their July Issue – Market Spotlight: Serbia, once again recognized Živković Samardžić’s hard work, for which we were ranked in the third place in the category “Firms with the most client matters reported”, with 59 client matters reported in the period from December 2013 – June 2023. 

In addition to that, our Corporate and M&A Partner, Igor Živkovski, has been listed as the second best in the category “Partners with the most client matter reported”, with 29 client matters reported in the same period.

These recognitions come at the special time for our law firm, having in mind that this month we are celebrating 25 years of Živković Samardžić’s existence on the Serbian law market which makes us one of Serbia’s commercial law firms with the longest tradition.

We are extremely grateful to our clients, business contact and fellow lawyers for their support and the entire Živković Samardžić team for continuous hard work in the past years, which made it possible to achieve this great result that gives us wind in the back and motivation to strive and work harder in the years to come.

CEE Legal Matters is a print and online publication for and about lawyers interested and working in Europe’s emerging legal markets, featuring news, interviews, analysis, opinion, and more with a mission to be the go-to source of information about lawyers and legal markets in Central and Eastern Europe.

Corporate and M&AIgor Živkovski
Read more
  • Published in Uncategorized
No Comments

Živković Samardžić Advises TinySeed on Investment in Startup Plainly

Monday, 19 June 2023 by ZS Law

Živković Samardžić has advised TinySeed, a US venture capital fund which runs a remote accelerator designed for early-stage SaaS founders, on its investment in Plainly, a startup developing video generation API that allows businesses to create automated video creation workflows and increase their marketing output, scale up personalized sales or improve internal communications.

Plainly was one of the 26 startups that were accepted to participate in the Fall 2022 Americas and EMEA accelerator programs designed to help founders with a revenue-generating SaaS optimize product-market fit and grow faster, organized by TinySeed, which allowed Plainly to receive support, answers, and accountability needed to scale its business faster.

TinySeed is a year-long, remote accelerator that funds 15-20 SaaS companies at once. Those companies go through their accelerator program as a batch. TinySeed’s mission is to increase the world’s population of independent SaaS companies, giving capital-efficient startups an option between bootstrapping and raising traditional venture capital. It specializes in the fields of financial services, software, and venture capital.

Živković Samardžić team led by Partner Igor Živkovski and Associate Ana Grebo assisted TinySeed with performing due diligence of Plainly, structuring the transaction, drafting and negotiating of transactional documentation, as well as closing activities related to the investment.

Corporate and M&AIgor ŽivkovskiAna grebo
Read more
  • Published in Deals and Cases
No Comments

Commercial and Residential leasing: Useful guidelines

Friday, 02 June 2023 by ZS Law

Concluding a Lease Agreement, regardless of whether it is commercial or residential, is not as easy as people are led to believe. Both commercial and residential leases represent legally binding agreements made between a lessor and a lessee, by which the lessee is entitled to use the leased real estate for a certain period of time, for an agreed fee. Commercial property lease refers to leasing business premises, warehouses, mall stands, etc., for various business purposes, while the residential property lease Is reserved for leasing apartments and houses for residential purposes.

One may argue that the commercial and residential leases are both the same and that the only difference is the subject of the lease. However, although the essence of these agreements is the same, commercial property lease agreements come with much more complex lease terms and a need for greater legal protection.

Complexity of the commercial property lease agreements is reflected in duration of the lease, necessity of a due diligence before signing the agreement, indexation and changes of the rent amount, rent free periods, subleasing, maintenance costs and similar expenses, investing in business premises (for e.g. remodeling or renovating), security deposit and other means of security, termination of the agreement, enforceability clauses and many other formalities which are not typical for residential property lease.

Therefore, this article is written to help people to get a grasp of the complexity of a commercial and residential lease and understand all the implications of such lease agreements, while answering a few important questions.

Why do I need a legal Due Diligence before signing the Lease Agreement?

You found suitable business premises or apartment and you want to lease it. Now what?

Beyond a standard search at the land registry, most people don’t thoroughly inspect the status of the real estate, i.e., conduct a proper Due Diligence, before signing a Lease Agreement. Although Due Diligence is just a commonly used phrase in most property related transactions, it is greatly overlooked in practice. The key objective of Due Diligence is to thoroughly inspect every relevant aspect of the prospect real estate, ownership rights or other rights, change of ownership, ongoing judicial/extra judicial procedures, initiated administrative procedures, registered encumbrances, limitations, etc.

Besides that, the most important part of a Due Diligence is to make sure that all contracting parties thoroughly read and completely understand all provisions and potential ramifications of such legal agreement before signing.

Therefore, it is highly advisable that before signing any Lease Agreement, every prospect lessee engage an attorney at law, specialized in real estate matters, in order to conduct a legal Due Diligence to fully inspect the real estate.

Once the Lease Agreement is signed, it may be too late to negotiate additional or better terms.

Are negotiations necessary?

Negotiating a good lease term is vital to the success of your business. Usually, the lessor or lessor’s attorney at law will have prepared Lease Agreement (template) that contains terms and conditions that are acceptable to the lessor. However, do such terms suit your needs as a lessee? If the lessor offers you an already prepared Lease Agreement it doesn’t mean that it’s not negotiable. Rent amount, dynamic of payment, indexation, future changes, rent free periods, maintenance and operating expenses, termination of the agreement, enforceability clauses, options to renew, etc., can all be negotiated with the lessor.

This is especially important if the lessee wants to invest his own funds to remodel or renovate the real estate to suit his business or residential needs. Besides that, termination of the Lease Agreement is particularly important and is often overlooked. Most lessors will predict that they can unilaterally terminate the Lease Agreement at any time without a specific cause, while the lessee won’t be able to do such thing without other party’s responsibility for termination. Premature termination without justifiable cause would often be secured with contractual penalties and therefore termination of such an agreement could be costly.

Negotiations could require you to go back and forth with the other party, which in some cases can last up to a few weeks. Be prepared to allocate sufficient time to negotiate and most importantly, do not be pressured into signing a lease without first seeking legal advice because just one mistake could cost you in the long run.

To summarize everything, in order to negotiate a good deal for your business or residential purposes you must always seek legal advice from your attorney at law, be clear on your financial bottom line before you start negotiating, allow sufficient time to consider the terms and conditions of the lease to identify what is acceptable for you, ensure that everything discussed and agreed is put in writing (for e.g. via e-mail), always anticipate changes in the future, leave your emotions at home and be prepared to walk away from negotiations if necessary.

Does the Lease Agreement have to be in writing? Aren’t oral agreements valid?  

Although positive regulations of the Republic of Serbia don’t prescribe the form in which the Lease Agreements must be concluded, business practice and modus operandi of legal entities in Serbia is that the writing form of the commercial lease agreement is a necessity, mainly as the basis for the payment of the rents, determining tax obligations and required accounting purposes.

Oral agreements are more common in the residential lease sphere due to the lesser complexity of the agreement. Although Law on Housing and Maintenance of Buildings (“Official Gazette of RS”, no. 104/2016 and 9/2020) prescribe that residential lease agreements should be concluded in writing, such a provision is not imperative in nature and was given for the reason of reporting the lessee to the manager of the housing community so that the lessee could participate in the costs of maintenance and management of the building.

Furthermore, it’s very hard, sometimes impossible, to legally enforce an agreement that hasn’t been made in writing. If in such situations the dispute is taken to court, you will need more evidence, including proving your rights with witnesses and other documentation, which will significantly reduce your chances of winning that dispute. Another important reason for concluding a Lease Agreement in writing is for determining the rent income tax, which would be much easier to implement if you have a written Lease Agreement.

Having that in mind, a verbal agreement between the lessor and the lessee is sufficient, however is that the best way to conclude such an important agreement which will possibly last you for many years?

What is the enforceability clause?

No matter how the mutual relations between the lessor and the lessee are great at the moment of the conclusion of the Lease Agreement, no one can foresee problems (for e.g., disturbed relations) in the future. What if the lessee simply doesn’t want to move out of the business premises or the apartment after the lease is terminated? Do you really need to file an eviction lawsuit and come to terms with the fact that the judicial procedure will last for a few years?

Of course not. There is a much easier and efficient way.

It’s highly advisable that the lessor always predict enforceability clause in the Lease Agreement and solemnize it before the notary public. By doing so, the Lease Agreement will be legally enforced, and therefore it can be registered in the real estate cadaster records. More importantly, if the Lease Agreement is terminated, or cease to exist, and the lessee won’t move out of the leased property, lessor can just initiate the enforcement procedure before the competent public bailiff, without the need to initiate judicial procedure before the competent court that will last for years.

As you may see, only one small clause in the Lease Agreement and negligible costs of the public notary regarding the solemnization of the agreement can make a huge difference and save you years of court proceedings and judicial costs.

Who is responsible for repairs and maintenance?

Commercial and residential lessees have an obligation to maintain leased premises in a reasonable condition. A commercial lessee is responsible for most smaller repairs and maintenance works, while the lessor maintains the physical condition of the building (walls, roof, foundation, etc.) and shared areas of the building. This also includes repair of structural and major component parts of the leased premises, as well as any replacements that would be considered capital expenditures.

On the other hand, residential lessee has fewer repair and maintenance duties than the commercial lessee and should always notify the lessor when repair and maintenance works are necessary.

Notwithstanding the above-mentioned, repair and maintenance works are in most cases negotiable and therefore contracting parties should always be careful to clearly apportion these responsibilities in the Lease Agreement to avoid any ambiguity.

Prospective lessees should always read carefully and clarify any doubts regarding clauses dictating who pays for these maintenance and repair costs for common areas, heat, water, elevator, and air conditioning, plumbing, electrical wiring, equipment, and machinery, pest control, damages caused by pest infestations, damages from fire and other natural disasters.

Do I have to pay taxes as well?

Leasing real estate can be a lucrative business, especially if you own a property in one of the more “expensive” locations in the city. When renting real estate, you are obliged to pay taxes, that may differ depending on whether the lessor and lessee are natural person or legal entity and whether it is in the VAT system.

When the real estate is leased by a legal entity or an entrepreneur (who is obliged to have business records) which are not in the VAT system, there is no obligation to pay tax for renting. In such situations, profit is considered the income of the legal entity, i.e., the entrepreneur, and is taxed as profit at the end of the year. On the other hand, if a lessor is a legal entity or an entrepreneur in the VAT system, there is an obligation to pay tax at the general rate on the lease of real estate. There is an exemption prescribed by the Law on Value-Added Tax of the Republic of Serbia in the situation when a natural person leases real estate for residential purposes from the legal entity in the VAT system. In that case, that legal entity has the right to tax exemption without the right to deduct previous tax.

When the lessor is a natural person, he is liable for real estate income tax. The tax rate on income from real estate is 20% of gross income, minus the standardized expenditures of 25%. Lessor is obliged to submit a tax return to the Tax Administration on the territory of which the leased real estate is located, within 30 days from the date of income realization.

Besides that, it’s often agreed that when concluding the Lease Agreement, the lessee will make a deposit to the lessor in case of eventual damage. For receiving the deposit, the lessor is not obliged to pay tax. However, if the lessor and the lessee agree that the amount of the deposit will be used as compensation, or part of the compensation for a certain period, the lessor will be obliged to calculate and pay tax on that basis. We hope this article was helpful and that you got at least a grasp of the complexity of commercial and residential lease agreements. For more information regarding the commercial and residential leasing, as well as complete legal assistance in this regard, please feel free to contact our lawyers Uros Djordjevic (uros.djordjevic@zslaw.rs), Srdjan Zerdo (srdjan.zerdo@zslaw.rs), and Miroslav Zivanovic (miroslav.zivanovic@zslaw.rs).


Komercijalni i stambeni zakup: korisne smernice

Zaključivanje Ugovora o zakupu, bez obzira na to da li je komercijalni ili stambeni, nije tako lako kao što deluje. I komercijalni i stambeni zakup predstavljaju pravno obavezujuće ugovore zaključene između zakupodavca i zakupca, na osnovu kojih zakupac ima pravo da koristi nepokretnost koja je predmet ugovora, na određeno vreme, uz ugovorenu naknadu. Komercijalni zakup nepokretnosti odnosi se na zakup poslovnog prostora, magacina, štandova tržnih centara itd., u različite poslovne svrhe, dok je stambeni zakup nepokretnosti rezervisan za zakup stanova i kuća za potrebe stanovanja.

Možemo reći da su komercijalni i stambeni zakup isti i da je jedina razlika predmet zakupa. Međutim, iako je suština ovih sporazuma ista, ugovori o zakupu komercijalne nepokretnosti dolaze sa mnogo složenijim uslovima zakupa i većom potrebom za pravnom zaštitom.

Složenost ugovora o zakupu komercijalne nepokretnosti ogleda se u trajanju zakupa, neophodnosti due diligence provere pre potpisivanja ugovora, indeksaciji i izmenama iznosa zakupa, periodima bez plaćanja zakupa, podzakupu, troškovima održavanja i sličnim troškovima, ulaganju u poslovni prostor (za npr. preuređenje ili renoviranje), depozitu i drugim sredstvima obezbeđenja, raskidu ugovora, klauzulama izvršnosti i mnogim drugim formalnostima koje nisu tipične za zakup stambenih nepokretnosti.

Stoga je ovaj članak napisan kako bi pomogao čitaocima da shvate složenost komercijalnog i stambenog zakupa i razumeju sve posledice takvih ugovora, istovremeno odgovarajući na nekoliko važnih pitanja.

Zašto mi je potrebna pravna due diligence provera pre potpisivanja ugovora o zakupu?

Pronašli ste odgovarajući poslovni prostor ili stan i želite da ga zakupite. Šta sada?

Pored standardne pretrage u katastru nepokretnosti, većina ljudi ne proverava temeljno pravni status nepokretnosti, odnosno ne sprovodi odgovarajuće due diligence provere, pre potpisivanja Ugovora o zakupu. Iako je due diligence samo često korišćena fraza u većini transakcija vezanih za nepokretnosti, ona se u velikoj meri previđa u praksi. Ključni cilj due dilligence je detaljna provera svakog relevantnog aspekta nepokretnosti, vlasničkih prava ili drugih prava, promena vlasništva, tekućeg sudskog/vansudskog postupka, pokrenutog upravnog postupka, registrovani tereti, ograničenja, itd.

Pored toga, najvažniji deo due diligence je da se utvrdi da su sve ugovorne strane temeljno pročitale i u potpunosti razumele sve odredbe i potencijalne posledice potpisivanja takvog Ugovora.

Stoga se preporučuje da pre potpisivanja bilo kakvog Ugovora o zakupu, svaki potencijalni zakupac angažuje advokata, specijalizovanog za oblast nepokretnosti, kako bi se sproveo due diligence radi potpune provere nepokretnosti.

Kada je ugovor o zakupu već potpisan, možda će biti prekasno da se pregovara o dodatnim ili boljim uslovima.

Da li su pregovori neophodni?

Pregovaranje o dobrim uslovima zakupa je ključno za uspeh u vašem poslovanju. Obično, zakupodavac ili njegov advokat već imaju pripremljen ugovor o zakupu (pelcer) koji sadrži uslove koji više odgovaraju zakupodavcu. Međutim, da li takvi uslovi odgovaraju i vama kao zakupcu? Ako vam zakupodavac ponudi već pripremljen ugovor o zakupu, to ne znači da ne postoji mogućnost pregovoranja. Cena zakupa, dinamika isplate, indeksacija, buduće promene uslova iz ugovora, periodima bez plaćanja zakupa, tekući troškovi i troškovi održavanja, raskid ugovora, klauzule izvršnosti, opcija produženja ugovora, itd. o svemu tome je moguće pregovarati sa zakupodavcem.

Ovo posebno važi ako zakupac želi da uloži svoja sredstva u renoviranje i preuređivanje nepokretnosti tako da više odgovara njegovim poslovnim potrebama i potrebama stanovanja. Pored toga, raskid ugovora o zakupu je posebno važan i često se zanemari. Većina zakupodavaca će predvideti mogućnost jednostranog raskida ugovora bez posebnog razloga, dok sa druge strane zakupac ne bi bio u mogućnosti da na takav način raskine ugovor, bez postojanja odgovornosti druge strane. Prevremeni raskid ugovora bez opravdanog razloga bi često bio obezbeđen ugovornim kaznama, tako da bi raskid takvog ugovora predstavljao veliki trošak.

Pregovori mogu da zahtevaju konstantu komunikaciju sa drugom stranom, što u nekim situacijama može trajati i do nekoliko nedelja. Pripremite se da izdvojite dovoljno vremena za pregovore ali najvažnije, ne dozvolite da budete prisiljeni na zaključenje takvog ugovora bez prethodne konsultacije sa advokatom jer bi vas jedna greška mogla dugoročno skupo koštati.

Zaključak je da kako biste ispregovarali ugovor o zakupu pod dobrim uslovima za svoje poslovne ili lične potrebe, bilo bi poželjno potražiti savet advokata, biti svesni svojih finansijskih mogućnosti, dati sebi dovoljno vremena za razmišljanje o uslovima zakupa, kao i da se osigurate da  je o svemu o čemu je pregovarano ostavljen i pismeni trag (npr. mail), uvek imate u vidu buduće promene, ostavite svoje emocije po strani i budite spremni da okončate pregovora ukoliko je to potrebno.

Da li Ugovor u zakupu mora biti zaključen u pisanoj formi? Zar nije i usmena forma punovažna?

Iako pozitivno pravo Republike Srbije ne predviđa formu zaključenja ugovora o zakupu, poslovna praksa i modus operandi pravnih lica u Srbiji je takva da je pisana forma komercijalnih ugovora o zakupu neophodna, najviše zbog plaćanja zakupa, utvrđivanja poreskih obaveza i potrebe računovodstva.

Usmena forma ugovora o zakupu se pretežno zadržala u sferi stambenog zakupa, zbog manje složenosti ugovora. Iako Zakon o planiranju i izgradnji (,, Službeni glasnik RS’’, br. 104/2016 i 9/2020) predviđa da ugovori o stambenom zakupu treba da budu zaključeni u pisanoj formi, ovakva odredba nije imperativne prirode i propisana je iz razloga prijavljivanju zakupca upravniku zgrade, kako bi učestvovao u troškovima održavanja i upravljanja zgradom.

Štaviše, veoma je teško, ponekada i nemoguće dokazati da ugovor koji nije sastavljen u pisanoj formi ima pravno dejstvo. Ako bi u ovakvim situacijama došlo do spora pred sudom, biće vam potrebno više dokaza, uključujući i dokazivanje svojih prava uz pomoć svedoka i druge dokumentacije, što bi značajno umanjilo vaše šanse da dobijete spor. Drugi važan razlog zaključivanja ugovora o zakupu u pisanoj formi je utvrđivanje poreza na prihod od zakupa, što je mnogo jednostavnije kada imate pisani ugovor o zakupu.

Imajte na umu, da je usmena forma ugovora o zakupu između zakupodavca i zakupca dovoljna, međutim da li je to najbolji način da se zaključi tako važan ugovor koji će verovatno trajati godinama?

Šta predstavlja klauzula izvršnosti?

Bez obzira na kvalitet odnosa između zakupodavca i zakupca u trenutku zaključenja Ugovora o zakupu, niko ne može predvideti nastanak potencijalnih problema u budućnosti (npr. narušeni odnosi). Šta će se desiti ukoliko zakupac jednostavno ne želi da se iseli iz poslovnog prostora ili stana nakon isteka zakupa? Da li će biti potrebno da podnesete tužbu za iseljenje i samim tim prihvatite činjenicu da sudski postupak može trajati nekoliko godina?

Naravno da ne. Postoji dosta lakši i efikasniji način rešavanja problema.

Naime, preporučljivo je da zakupodavac uvek predvidi klauzulu izvršnosti u Ugovoru o zakupu i da istu solemnizuje pred javnim beležnikom. Na taj način, ugovor o zakupu će proizvoditi pravno dejstvo, i može se upisati u evidenciju katastra nepokretnosti. Što je još važnije, ako ugovor o zakupu bude raskinut, ili postane ništav, a zakupac se ne iseli iz zakupljene nepokretnosti, zakupodavac može pokrenuti izvršni postupak pred nadležnim javnim izvršiteljem, bez potrebe za pokretanjem sudskog postupka pred nadležnim sudom, a koji bi trajao godinama.

Iz gorenavedenog se može zaključiti da samo jedna mala klauzula u Ugovoru o zakupu i zanemarljivi troškovi javnog beležnika u vezi sa solemnizacijom ugovora mogu napraviti ogromnu razliku i uštedeti godine trajanja sudskih postupaka i sudskih troškova.

Ko je odgovoran za popravke i održavanje predmeta zakupa?

Komercijalni i stambeni zakupci imaju obavezu da održavaju zakupljene prostorije u prikladnom stanju. Komercijalni zakupac je odgovoran za većinu manjih popravki i održavanje, dok je zakupodavac dužan da održava fizičko stanje zgrade (zidove, krov, temelj, itd.) i zajedničke prostorije zgrade. Ovo takođe uključuje popravku strukturnih i glavnih sastavnih delova iznajmljenih prostorija, kao i sve zamene koje bi se smatrale kapitalnim izdacima.

S druge strane, stambeni zakupac ima manje obaveza u vidu popravke i održavanja prostorija od komercijalnog, i kao takav uvek treba da obavesti zakupodavca kada su potrebni radovi radi popravke i održavanja.

Bez obzira na gorenavedeno, radovi radi popravke i održavanja su u većini slučajeva podložni pregovorima i stoga ugovorne strane uvek treba da vode računa da jasno rasporede ove odgovornosti u Ugovoru o zakupu kako bi izbegle bilo kakvu nepredviđenu okolnost.

Potencijalni zakupci bi trebalo uvek pažljivo da pročitaju i razjasne sve nedoumice u vezi sa klauzulama koje diktiraju ko plaća troškove održavanja i popravke za zajedničke prostore, grejanje, vodu, lift, i klimatizaciju, vodovod, električne instalacije, opremu i mašine, deratizaciju, štetu prouzrokovanu najezdom štetočina, štetom nastalom od požara i drugim elementarnim nepogodama.

Ko je u obavezi da plati porez?

Iznajmljivanje nepokretnosti može biti unosan posao, posebno ako posedujete nepokretnost na nekoj od „ekskluzivnih“ lokacija u gradu. Prilikom iznajmljivanja nepokretnosti u obavezi ste da platite porez, koji se može razlikovati u zavisnosti od toga da li su zakupodavac i zakupac fizičko ili pravno lice i da li je pravno lice u sistemu PDV-a.

Kada nepokretnost izdaje u zakup pravno lice ili preduzetnik (koji je dužan da vodi poslovne knjige) koji nisu u sistemu PDV-a, ne postoji obaveza plaćanja poreza za izdavanje. U takvim situacijama dobit se smatra prihodom pravnog lica, odnosno preduzetnika, i oporezuje se kao dobit na kraju godine. S druge strane, ako je zakupodavac pravno lice ili preduzetnik u sistemu PDV-a, postoji obaveza plaćanja poreza po poreskoj stopi na zakup nepokretnosti. Postoji izuzetak propisan Zakonom o porezu na dodatu vrednost Republike Srbije u situaciji kada je fizičko lice zakupac nepokretnosti i istu iznajmljuje za potrebe stanovanja od pravnog lica koje je u sistemu PDV-a. U tom slučaju to pravno lice ima pravo na poresko oslobođenje bez prava na odbitak prethodnog poreza.

Kada je zakupodavac fizičko lice, obveznik je poreza na prihod od nepokretnosti. Poreska stopa na prihode od nepokretnosti iznosi 20% bruto prihoda, umanjena za normirane troškove od 25%. Zakupodavac je dužan da u roku od 30 dana od dana ostvarivanja prihoda podnese poresku prijavu Poreskoj upravi na čijoj teritoriji se nalazi nepokretnost koja se daje u zakup.

Pored toga, često se ugovara da prilikom zaključivanja Ugovora o zakupu, zakupac isplati depozit zakupodavcu u slučaju eventualne štete. Za preuzimanje depozita zakupodavac nije dužan da plati porez. Međutim, ako se zakupodavac i zakupac dogovore da će se iznos depozita koristiti kao naknada, ili deo naknade za određeni period, zakupodavac će biti u obavezi da po tom osnovu obračuna i plati porez.

Nadamo se da je ovaj članak bio od pomoći i da ste barem shvatili složenost ugovora o komercijalnom i stambenom zakupu. Za više informacija u vezi sa zakupom komercijalnog i stambenog prostora, kao i kompletnu pravnu pomoć u vezi sa tim, slobodno se obratite našim advokatima Urošu Đorđeviću (uros.djordjevic@zslaw.rs), Srđanu Zerdu (srdjan.zerdo@zslaw.rs), i Miroslavu Živanoviću (miroslav.zivanovic@zslaw.rs).

Read more
  • Published in Insights
No Comments

A major step forward in the digitalization of the business operations of the Serbian Business Registers Agency: In the future, the establishment of companies will only be possible electronically

Wednesday, 17 May 2023 by ZS Law

As a result of the entry into force of the provisions of the Law on Amendments to the Law on the Procedure of Registration in the Serbian Business Registers Agency, whose application was postponed, starting from May 17, 2023, it will no longer be possible to submit documentation for the establishment of companies to the Serbian Business Registers Agency in paper form, but exclusively in electronic form. However, it will still be possible to submit the registration application for the establishment of a cooperative, public company, representative office, or branch of a foreign company in paper form. Namely, for the applicant to successfully complete the electronic registration application for the establishment of a company, he must first possess:

  • a qualified electronic certificate (electronic signature) issued by a certification body in the Republic of Serbia – the electronic certificate is linked to one of the personal data, such as personal name , passport number and country of issue and/or personal number for a foreigner and/or ID card number and country of issue, and if any of the registered data changes, there is a possibility that the applicant will not be able to electronically sign a certain document;
  • installed electronic card reader and installed NEXU application for electronic signature; and
  • Visa, MasterCard or Dina payment cards for administrative fee payment.

It is necessary to keep in mind that in the electronic registration process, all attached documents must be in electronic form, which can create doubts about what should be done with documents that were initially created in paper form and exist only as such. The legislator resolved this issue by making available the possibility of digitization, i.e., converting a document from paper to electronic form, i.e., into an electronic document that produces the same legal force as a document in paper form, and this is possible if such an electronic document is authenticated (signed) with an electronic signature. This obligation stems from the provisions of the Law on Electronic Documents, Electronic Identification and Trust Services in Electronic Business („Official Gazette of the Republic of Serbia”, Nos. 94/2017 and 52/2021) (hereinafter: the Law), according to which the digitized document is considered a copy, which is why it is necessary to be certified by an electronic signature or electronic sea of:

  1. the person who issued the document (depending on which authority issued the specific act, e.g., authorized person in the bank, Tax Administration, etc.);
  2. the person authorized by Law to certify the documents (notary public);
  3. an attorney at law registered in the directory of the Bar Association of Serbia (however, in this case, an additional condition is set that the attorney at law during digitization and certification must also be a signatory of the registration application, via Power of Attorney).

Additional doubts may arise in connection with electronic documents issued by foreign authorities, because the Serbian Business Registers Agency has informed that for now it is not possible to submit electronic documents issued by foreign authorities, because in accordance with the provision of Article 40 of the Law, it is prescribed that foreign qualified services of trust can be recognized in Serbia only in case of existence of reciprocity regulated by confirmed international agreements. Therefore, for now, the only solution is to print the electronic document issued by a foreign authority in the country of origin and to have the printed copy certified by the competent authority in the issuing country. After that, such document can be digitized and certified by a notary/attorney at law of the Republic of Serbia and used as such in the registration process.

Although these novelties represent a significant step forward and are worthy of all praise, and the fact is that digitization transforms the way public administration works in the Republic of Serbia, thereby increasing the economy and quality of its work, and at the same time making it easier for citizens to carry out their daily bureaucratic duties, there is no doubt that there will be a period of adaptation for all actors of this procedure to the emerging developments.

For more detailed information regarding the submission of the mandatory electronic registration application for the establishment of legal entities, as well as for complete legal assistance in this regard, please feel free to contact our lawyers in the Corporate/M&A department, Partners Igor Živkovski and Sava Pavlović, or your regular contact person in  Živković Samardžić Law Office.


Veliki iskorak u digitalizaciji poslovanja Agencije za privredne registre: Osnivanje privrednih društava ubuduće će biti moguće samo elektronskim putem

Kao posledica stupanja na snagu odredaba Zakona o izmenama i dopunama Zakona o postupku registracije u Agencije za privredne registre, a čija primena je bila odložena, počevši od 17. maja 2023. godine, Agenciji za privredne registre više neće biti moguće podnositi dokumentaciju za osnivanje privrednih društava u papirnoj formi, već isključivo u elektronskom obliku. Međutim, registracionu prijavu osnivanja zadruge, javnog preduzeća, predstavništva ili ogranka stranog privrednog društva biće i dalje moguće podneti u papirnoj formi.

Naime, kako bi podnosilac elektronske registracione prijave osnivanja privrednog društva istu izvršio uspešno, potrebno je da prethodno poseduje:

  • kvalifikovani elektronski sertifikat (elektronski potpis) izdat od sertifikacionog tela u Republici Srbiji – elektronski sertifikat se vezuje za jedan od ličnih podataka, kao što su lično ime, broj pasoša i država izdavanja i/ili lični broj za stranca i/ili broj lične karte i zemlja izdavanja, te ukoliko se neki od registrovanih podataka promeni, postoji mogućnost da podnosilac neće biti u mogućnosti da elektronski potpiše određeni dokument;
  • instaliran čitač elektronskih kartica i instaliranu NEXU aplikaciju za elektronsko potpisivanje; i
  • Visa, MasterCard ili Dina platne kartice za potrebe plaćanja administrativne takse.

Potrebno je imati u vidu da u postupku elektronske registracije svi priloženi dokumenti moraju biti u elektronskom obliku, što može stvoriti nedoumice oko toga šta bi trebalo uraditi sa dokumentima koji su inicijalno sačinjeni u papirnoj formi i isključivo kao takvi postoje. Zakonodavac je ovo pitanje rešio tako što je stavio na raspolaganje mogućnost digitalizacije, odnosno pretvaranje dokumenta iz papirne u elektronsku formu, tj. u elektronski dokument koji proizvodi istu pravnu snagu kao dokument u papirnoj formi, a to je moguće ukoliko je takav elektronski dokument overen (potpisan) elektronskim potpisom. Ova obaveza proizilazi iz odredaba Zakona o elektronskom dokumentu, elektronskoj identifikaciji i uslugama od poverenja u elektronskom poslovanju („Službeni glasnik Republike Srbije”, br. 94/2017 i 52/2021, u daljem tekstu: Zakon), prema kojem se digitalizovani dokument smatra kopijom, zbog čega je neophodno da ga svojim elektronskim potpisom ili elektronskim pečatom overi:

  1. lice koje je dokument izdalo (u zavisnosti od toga koji je organ doneo određeni akt, npr. ovlašćeno lice u banci, Poreskoj upravi, itd.);
  2. lice koje je zakonom ovlašćeno za overu prepisa (javni beležnik);
  3. advokat upisan u imenik Advokatske komore Srbije (međutim u tom slučaju se postavlja dodatni uslov da kada advokat vrši digitalizaciju i overu, potrebno je da bude i potpisnik registracione prijave, odnosno punomoćnik).

Dodatne nedoumice mogu nastati u vezi sa elektronskim dokumentima koju su izdati od strane inostranih organa, jer je Agencija za privredne registre obavestila da za sada nije moguće podnositi elektronske dokumente koji su izdati od strane inostranih organa, jer je u skladu sa odredbom člana 40. Zakona propisano da se inostrane kvalifikovane usluge od poverenja u Srbiji mogu priznavati samo u slučaju postojanja reciprociteta regulisanog potvrđenim međunarodnim sporazumima. Dakle, za sada je jedino rešenje da se elektronski dokument izdat od strane inostranog organa odštampa u zemlji porekla i da se tako odštampana kopija overi od strane nadležnog organa u državi izdavanja. Nakon toga se takav dokument može digitalizovati i overiti od strane notara/advokata Republike Srbije i kao takav koristiti u postupku registracije.

Iako ove novine predstavljaju značajan korak napred i vredne su svake pohvale, te je činjenica da se digitalizacijom transformiše način rada javne uprave u Republici Srbiji i time podiže ekonomičnost i kvalitet njenog rada, a građanima istovremeno olakšava izvršavanje svakodnevnih birokratskih obaveza, nesumnjivo je da svim akterima ovog postupka sledi period adaptiranja na nastupele novine.

Za detaljnije informacije u vezi sa podnošenjem obavezne elektronske registracione prijave osnivanja privrednog društva, kao i za kompletnu pravnu pomoć u vezi sa tim, budite slobodni da kontaktirate naše partnere u Corporate/M&A odeljenju, Igora Živkovskog i Savu Pavlovića, ili Vašu redovnu kontakt osobu u advokatskoj kancelariji Živković Samardžić.

Sava PavlovićCorporate and M&AIgor Živkovski
Read more
  • Published in Client Updates
No Comments

What are the new amendments to the Law on Planning and Construction bringing?

Thursday, 11 May 2023 by ZS Law

At the session of the Government of the Republic of Serbia held on May 4th, 2023, the members of the Government adopted the Proposal of Amendments to the Law on Planning and Construction, which brings several important changes in the field of construction. The introduction of these novelties in the construction industry in Serbia is expected to facilitate the process of issuing building permits, improve the energy efficiency of buildings, reduce negative impact on the environment, and encourage the development of sustainable practices in construction.

The most significant novelty that the new law should introduce is the abolition of the conversion of the right to use into the right of ownership of construction land with compensation (conversion of construction land with compensation) for certain categories of individuals. Since the application of current regulations has not realized its potential to end the process of property transformation of construction land, it was necessary to find a new legal solution. According to the new legal solution, the payment of compensation for conversion is abolished except for the following group of individuals whose position will be determined by special regulations, which include sports associations and clubs, housing and agricultural cooperatives, as well as individuals to whom Annex G of the succession applies.

An important novelty is the recognition and definition of the concept of “green construction” and other elements of the green agenda. Accordingly, the Draft Law stipulates that energy efficiency, sustainable materials and technologies, waste management, water and air protection, and similar issues must be taken into account in the planning and construction of buildings.

Another new term appearing in the Draft Law is “E-space,” referring to the information system for spatial planning and construction. The introduction of this system is expected to facilitate the processes of issuing building permits and other necessary permits.

In addition, the Draft Law introduces the obligation to establish the Agency for Spatial Planning and Urbanism of the Republic of Serbia, which will take over some of the competencies that have so far been under the jurisdiction of the state authorities. All planning documents adopted in accordance with this law will be recorded in the Central Register of Planning Documents, which will be under the authority of the Agency.

Moreover, the Draft Law stipulates the obligation of local self-government units to provide information on “brownfield” locations within their territory, which are industrial and commercial facilities that have not been used for a long period of time but have the potential for urban renewal, within six months. The Agency is obliged to compile a data register of these locations within six months of receiving the data on “brownfield” locations and make it publicly available. For more information regarding the future implementation of the Law on Planning and Construction, as well as complete legal assistance in this regard, please feel free to contact our lawyers Uros Djordjevic (uros.djordjevic@zslaw.rs), Srdjan Zerdo (srdjan.zerdo@zslaw.rs), and Miroslav Zivanovic (miroslav.zivanovic@zslaw.rs).


Šta donose nove izmene Zakona o planiranju i izgradnji?

Na sednici Vlade Republike Srbije održanoj 04.05.2023. godine, članovi Vlade usvojili su Predlog zakona o izmenama i dopunama Zakona o planiranju i izgradnji koji donosi nekoliko važnih promena u oblasti građevinarstva. Uvođenjem ovih novina u oblasti građevinarstva u Srbiji očekuje se olakšavanje procesa izdavanja dozvola za gradnju, unapređenje energetske efikasnosti objekata, smanjenje negativnog uticaja na životnu sredinu i podsticanje razvoja održivih praksi u građevinarstvu.

Najnačajnija novina koju bi novi zakon trebao da uvede jeste ukidanje pretvaranja prava korišćenja u pravo svojine na građevinskom zemljištu uz naknadu (konverzija građevinskog zemljišta uz naknadu) za određene kategorije lica. S obzirom da primena sadašnjih propisa nije ostvarila svoje potencijale sa ciljem okončanja procesa svojinske transformacije građevinskog zemljišta, bilo je neophodno pronaći novo zakonsko rešenje. Prema novom zakonskom rešenju ukida se plaćanje naknade za konverziju izuzev za sledeći krug lica čiji će položaj biti određen posebnim propisima, a u koja spadaju: sportska društva i udruženja, stambene i zemljoradničke zadruge, kao i lica na koja se primenjuje Aneks G o sukcesiji.

Važna novina je prepoznavanje i definisanje pojmova “zelene gradnje” i ostalih elemenata zelene agende. U skladu s tim, Nacrt zakona propisuje da se pri planiranju i izgradnji objekata mora voditi računa o energetskoj efikasnosti, održivim materijalima i tehnologijama, upravljanju otpadom, zaštiti vode i vazduha, i slično.

Još jedan novi termin koji se pojavljuje u Nacrtu zakona je “E-prostor”, koji se odnosi na informacioni sistem za prostorno planiranje i izgradnju. Uvođenjem ovog sistema očekuje se da će se olakšati procesi izdavanja dozvola za gradnju i drugih potrebnih dozvola.

Pored toga, Nacrt zakona uvodi i obavezu formiranja Agencije za prostorno planiranje i urbanizam Republike Srbije, koja će preuzeti deo nadležnosti koje su do sada bile u nadležnosti državnog organa. Svi planski dokumenti koji se donose u skladu sa ovim zakonom biće evidentirani u Centralnom registru planskih dokumenata, koji će biti u nadležnosti Agencije.

Takođe, Nacrt zakona propisuje obavezu jedinica lokalne samouprave da u roku od šest meseci dostave podatke o “brownfield” lokacijama na svojoj teritoriji, koje su industrijski i komercijalni objekti koji se ne koriste u dužem vremenskom periodu, a imaju potencijal za urbanu obnovu. Agencija je dužna da u roku od šest meseci od dostavljanja podataka o “brownfield” lokacijama sačini registar podataka o tim lokacijama i učini ga javno dostupnim. Za detaljnije informacije u vezi sa budućom primenom Zakona o planiranju i izgradnji, kao i kompletnu pravnu pomoć u vezi sa tim, slobodno kontaktirajte naše advokate Uroša Đorđevića (uros.djordjevic@zslaw.rs), Srđana Zerda (srdjan.zerdo@zslaw.rs) i Miroslava Živanovića (miroslav.zivanovic@zslaw.rs).

Miroslav ŽivanovićUroš ĐorđevićSrdjan Zerdo
Read more
  • Published in Client Updates
No Comments
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4

Makedonska 30 | Belgrade 11 000 | Serbia
t +381 11 2636 636 
f +381 11 2635 555
e-mail office@zslaw.rs

  • General Terms of Business
  • Disclaimer
  • Cookies
  • Privacy policy
TOP