SEE Legal Corporate and M&A Practice Group – Capability Statement 2025
SEE Legal, a network of 11 leading national law firms operating across 12 jurisdictions in South East Europe – including Živković Samardžić as the member firm from Serbia – has just released its Corporate and M&A Practice Group – 2025 Capability Statement.
Over the past two decades, SEE Legal member firms have successfully collaborated on major regional projects involving acquisitions, restructurings, and investments. This extensive joint experience has firmly established SEE Legal as a leading provider of legal services in the region.
You can explore selected highlights of SEE Legal’s recent cross-border work, showcasing the network’s deep and wide-ranging expertise here.
- Published in Insights
Commercial and Residential leasing: Useful guidelines
Concluding a Lease Agreement, regardless of whether it is commercial or residential, is not as easy as people are led to believe. Both commercial and residential leases represent legally binding agreements made between a lessor and a lessee, by which the lessee is entitled to use the leased real estate for a certain period of time, for an agreed fee. Commercial property lease refers to leasing business premises, warehouses, mall stands, etc., for various business purposes, while the residential property lease Is reserved for leasing apartments and houses for residential purposes.
One may argue that the commercial and residential leases are both the same and that the only difference is the subject of the lease. However, although the essence of these agreements is the same, commercial property lease agreements come with much more complex lease terms and a need for greater legal protection.
Complexity of the commercial property lease agreements is reflected in duration of the lease, necessity of a due diligence before signing the agreement, indexation and changes of the rent amount, rent free periods, subleasing, maintenance costs and similar expenses, investing in business premises (for e.g. remodeling or renovating), security deposit and other means of security, termination of the agreement, enforceability clauses and many other formalities which are not typical for residential property lease.
Therefore, this article is written to help people to get a grasp of the complexity of a commercial and residential lease and understand all the implications of such lease agreements, while answering a few important questions.
Why do I need a legal Due Diligence before signing the Lease Agreement?
You found suitable business premises or apartment and you want to lease it. Now what?
Beyond a standard search at the land registry, most people don’t thoroughly inspect the status of the real estate, i.e., conduct a proper Due Diligence, before signing a Lease Agreement. Although Due Diligence is just a commonly used phrase in most property related transactions, it is greatly overlooked in practice. The key objective of Due Diligence is to thoroughly inspect every relevant aspect of the prospect real estate, ownership rights or other rights, change of ownership, ongoing judicial/extra judicial procedures, initiated administrative procedures, registered encumbrances, limitations, etc.
Besides that, the most important part of a Due Diligence is to make sure that all contracting parties thoroughly read and completely understand all provisions and potential ramifications of such legal agreement before signing.
Therefore, it is highly advisable that before signing any Lease Agreement, every prospect lessee engage an attorney at law, specialized in real estate matters, in order to conduct a legal Due Diligence to fully inspect the real estate.
Once the Lease Agreement is signed, it may be too late to negotiate additional or better terms.
Are negotiations necessary?
Negotiating a good lease term is vital to the success of your business. Usually, the lessor or lessor’s attorney at law will have prepared Lease Agreement (template) that contains terms and conditions that are acceptable to the lessor. However, do such terms suit your needs as a lessee? If the lessor offers you an already prepared Lease Agreement it doesn’t mean that it’s not negotiable. Rent amount, dynamic of payment, indexation, future changes, rent free periods, maintenance and operating expenses, termination of the agreement, enforceability clauses, options to renew, etc., can all be negotiated with the lessor.
This is especially important if the lessee wants to invest his own funds to remodel or renovate the real estate to suit his business or residential needs. Besides that, termination of the Lease Agreement is particularly important and is often overlooked. Most lessors will predict that they can unilaterally terminate the Lease Agreement at any time without a specific cause, while the lessee won’t be able to do such thing without other party’s responsibility for termination. Premature termination without justifiable cause would often be secured with contractual penalties and therefore termination of such an agreement could be costly.
Negotiations could require you to go back and forth with the other party, which in some cases can last up to a few weeks. Be prepared to allocate sufficient time to negotiate and most importantly, do not be pressured into signing a lease without first seeking legal advice because just one mistake could cost you in the long run.
To summarize everything, in order to negotiate a good deal for your business or residential purposes you must always seek legal advice from your attorney at law, be clear on your financial bottom line before you start negotiating, allow sufficient time to consider the terms and conditions of the lease to identify what is acceptable for you, ensure that everything discussed and agreed is put in writing (for e.g. via e-mail), always anticipate changes in the future, leave your emotions at home and be prepared to walk away from negotiations if necessary.
Does the Lease Agreement have to be in writing? Aren’t oral agreements valid?
Although positive regulations of the Republic of Serbia don’t prescribe the form in which the Lease Agreements must be concluded, business practice and modus operandi of legal entities in Serbia is that the writing form of the commercial lease agreement is a necessity, mainly as the basis for the payment of the rents, determining tax obligations and required accounting purposes.
Oral agreements are more common in the residential lease sphere due to the lesser complexity of the agreement. Although Law on Housing and Maintenance of Buildings (“Official Gazette of RS”, no. 104/2016 and 9/2020) prescribe that residential lease agreements should be concluded in writing, such a provision is not imperative in nature and was given for the reason of reporting the lessee to the manager of the housing community so that the lessee could participate in the costs of maintenance and management of the building.
Furthermore, it’s very hard, sometimes impossible, to legally enforce an agreement that hasn’t been made in writing. If in such situations the dispute is taken to court, you will need more evidence, including proving your rights with witnesses and other documentation, which will significantly reduce your chances of winning that dispute. Another important reason for concluding a Lease Agreement in writing is for determining the rent income tax, which would be much easier to implement if you have a written Lease Agreement.
Having that in mind, a verbal agreement between the lessor and the lessee is sufficient, however is that the best way to conclude such an important agreement which will possibly last you for many years?
What is the enforceability clause?
No matter how the mutual relations between the lessor and the lessee are great at the moment of the conclusion of the Lease Agreement, no one can foresee problems (for e.g., disturbed relations) in the future. What if the lessee simply doesn’t want to move out of the business premises or the apartment after the lease is terminated? Do you really need to file an eviction lawsuit and come to terms with the fact that the judicial procedure will last for a few years?
Of course not. There is a much easier and efficient way.
It’s highly advisable that the lessor always predict enforceability clause in the Lease Agreement and solemnize it before the notary public. By doing so, the Lease Agreement will be legally enforced, and therefore it can be registered in the real estate cadaster records. More importantly, if the Lease Agreement is terminated, or cease to exist, and the lessee won’t move out of the leased property, lessor can just initiate the enforcement procedure before the competent public bailiff, without the need to initiate judicial procedure before the competent court that will last for years.
As you may see, only one small clause in the Lease Agreement and negligible costs of the public notary regarding the solemnization of the agreement can make a huge difference and save you years of court proceedings and judicial costs.
Who is responsible for repairs and maintenance?
Commercial and residential lessees have an obligation to maintain leased premises in a reasonable condition. A commercial lessee is responsible for most smaller repairs and maintenance works, while the lessor maintains the physical condition of the building (walls, roof, foundation, etc.) and shared areas of the building. This also includes repair of structural and major component parts of the leased premises, as well as any replacements that would be considered capital expenditures.
On the other hand, residential lessee has fewer repair and maintenance duties than the commercial lessee and should always notify the lessor when repair and maintenance works are necessary.
Notwithstanding the above-mentioned, repair and maintenance works are in most cases negotiable and therefore contracting parties should always be careful to clearly apportion these responsibilities in the Lease Agreement to avoid any ambiguity.
Prospective lessees should always read carefully and clarify any doubts regarding clauses dictating who pays for these maintenance and repair costs for common areas, heat, water, elevator, and air conditioning, plumbing, electrical wiring, equipment, and machinery, pest control, damages caused by pest infestations, damages from fire and other natural disasters.
Do I have to pay taxes as well?
Leasing real estate can be a lucrative business, especially if you own a property in one of the more “expensive” locations in the city. When renting real estate, you are obliged to pay taxes, that may differ depending on whether the lessor and lessee are natural person or legal entity and whether it is in the VAT system.
When the real estate is leased by a legal entity or an entrepreneur (who is obliged to have business records) which are not in the VAT system, there is no obligation to pay tax for renting. In such situations, profit is considered the income of the legal entity, i.e., the entrepreneur, and is taxed as profit at the end of the year. On the other hand, if a lessor is a legal entity or an entrepreneur in the VAT system, there is an obligation to pay tax at the general rate on the lease of real estate. There is an exemption prescribed by the Law on Value-Added Tax of the Republic of Serbia in the situation when a natural person leases real estate for residential purposes from the legal entity in the VAT system. In that case, that legal entity has the right to tax exemption without the right to deduct previous tax.
When the lessor is a natural person, he is liable for real estate income tax. The tax rate on income from real estate is 20% of gross income, minus the standardized expenditures of 25%. Lessor is obliged to submit a tax return to the Tax Administration on the territory of which the leased real estate is located, within 30 days from the date of income realization.
Besides that, it’s often agreed that when concluding the Lease Agreement, the lessee will make a deposit to the lessor in case of eventual damage. For receiving the deposit, the lessor is not obliged to pay tax. However, if the lessor and the lessee agree that the amount of the deposit will be used as compensation, or part of the compensation for a certain period, the lessor will be obliged to calculate and pay tax on that basis. We hope this article was helpful and that you got at least a grasp of the complexity of commercial and residential lease agreements. For more information regarding the commercial and residential leasing, as well as complete legal assistance in this regard, please feel free to contact our lawyers Uros Djordjevic (uros.djordjevic@zslaw.rs), Srdjan Zerdo (srdjan.zerdo@zslaw.rs), and Miroslav Zivanovic (miroslav.zivanovic@zslaw.rs).
Komercijalni i stambeni zakup: korisne smernice
Zaključivanje Ugovora o zakupu, bez obzira na to da li je komercijalni ili stambeni, nije tako lako kao što deluje. I komercijalni i stambeni zakup predstavljaju pravno obavezujuće ugovore zaključene između zakupodavca i zakupca, na osnovu kojih zakupac ima pravo da koristi nepokretnost koja je predmet ugovora, na određeno vreme, uz ugovorenu naknadu. Komercijalni zakup nepokretnosti odnosi se na zakup poslovnog prostora, magacina, štandova tržnih centara itd., u različite poslovne svrhe, dok je stambeni zakup nepokretnosti rezervisan za zakup stanova i kuća za potrebe stanovanja.
Možemo reći da su komercijalni i stambeni zakup isti i da je jedina razlika predmet zakupa. Međutim, iako je suština ovih sporazuma ista, ugovori o zakupu komercijalne nepokretnosti dolaze sa mnogo složenijim uslovima zakupa i većom potrebom za pravnom zaštitom.
Složenost ugovora o zakupu komercijalne nepokretnosti ogleda se u trajanju zakupa, neophodnosti due diligence provere pre potpisivanja ugovora, indeksaciji i izmenama iznosa zakupa, periodima bez plaćanja zakupa, podzakupu, troškovima održavanja i sličnim troškovima, ulaganju u poslovni prostor (za npr. preuređenje ili renoviranje), depozitu i drugim sredstvima obezbeđenja, raskidu ugovora, klauzulama izvršnosti i mnogim drugim formalnostima koje nisu tipične za zakup stambenih nepokretnosti.
Stoga je ovaj članak napisan kako bi pomogao čitaocima da shvate složenost komercijalnog i stambenog zakupa i razumeju sve posledice takvih ugovora, istovremeno odgovarajući na nekoliko važnih pitanja.
Zašto mi je potrebna pravna due diligence provera pre potpisivanja ugovora o zakupu?
Pronašli ste odgovarajući poslovni prostor ili stan i želite da ga zakupite. Šta sada?
Pored standardne pretrage u katastru nepokretnosti, većina ljudi ne proverava temeljno pravni status nepokretnosti, odnosno ne sprovodi odgovarajuće due diligence provere, pre potpisivanja Ugovora o zakupu. Iako je due diligence samo često korišćena fraza u većini transakcija vezanih za nepokretnosti, ona se u velikoj meri previđa u praksi. Ključni cilj due dilligence je detaljna provera svakog relevantnog aspekta nepokretnosti, vlasničkih prava ili drugih prava, promena vlasništva, tekućeg sudskog/vansudskog postupka, pokrenutog upravnog postupka, registrovani tereti, ograničenja, itd.
Pored toga, najvažniji deo due diligence je da se utvrdi da su sve ugovorne strane temeljno pročitale i u potpunosti razumele sve odredbe i potencijalne posledice potpisivanja takvog Ugovora.
Stoga se preporučuje da pre potpisivanja bilo kakvog Ugovora o zakupu, svaki potencijalni zakupac angažuje advokata, specijalizovanog za oblast nepokretnosti, kako bi se sproveo due diligence radi potpune provere nepokretnosti.
Kada je ugovor o zakupu već potpisan, možda će biti prekasno da se pregovara o dodatnim ili boljim uslovima.
Da li su pregovori neophodni?
Pregovaranje o dobrim uslovima zakupa je ključno za uspeh u vašem poslovanju. Obično, zakupodavac ili njegov advokat već imaju pripremljen ugovor o zakupu (pelcer) koji sadrži uslove koji više odgovaraju zakupodavcu. Međutim, da li takvi uslovi odgovaraju i vama kao zakupcu? Ako vam zakupodavac ponudi već pripremljen ugovor o zakupu, to ne znači da ne postoji mogućnost pregovoranja. Cena zakupa, dinamika isplate, indeksacija, buduće promene uslova iz ugovora, periodima bez plaćanja zakupa, tekući troškovi i troškovi održavanja, raskid ugovora, klauzule izvršnosti, opcija produženja ugovora, itd. o svemu tome je moguće pregovarati sa zakupodavcem.
Ovo posebno važi ako zakupac želi da uloži svoja sredstva u renoviranje i preuređivanje nepokretnosti tako da više odgovara njegovim poslovnim potrebama i potrebama stanovanja. Pored toga, raskid ugovora o zakupu je posebno važan i često se zanemari. Većina zakupodavaca će predvideti mogućnost jednostranog raskida ugovora bez posebnog razloga, dok sa druge strane zakupac ne bi bio u mogućnosti da na takav način raskine ugovor, bez postojanja odgovornosti druge strane. Prevremeni raskid ugovora bez opravdanog razloga bi često bio obezbeđen ugovornim kaznama, tako da bi raskid takvog ugovora predstavljao veliki trošak.
Pregovori mogu da zahtevaju konstantu komunikaciju sa drugom stranom, što u nekim situacijama može trajati i do nekoliko nedelja. Pripremite se da izdvojite dovoljno vremena za pregovore ali najvažnije, ne dozvolite da budete prisiljeni na zaključenje takvog ugovora bez prethodne konsultacije sa advokatom jer bi vas jedna greška mogla dugoročno skupo koštati.
Zaključak je da kako biste ispregovarali ugovor o zakupu pod dobrim uslovima za svoje poslovne ili lične potrebe, bilo bi poželjno potražiti savet advokata, biti svesni svojih finansijskih mogućnosti, dati sebi dovoljno vremena za razmišljanje o uslovima zakupa, kao i da se osigurate da je o svemu o čemu je pregovarano ostavljen i pismeni trag (npr. mail), uvek imate u vidu buduće promene, ostavite svoje emocije po strani i budite spremni da okončate pregovora ukoliko je to potrebno.
Da li Ugovor u zakupu mora biti zaključen u pisanoj formi? Zar nije i usmena forma punovažna?
Iako pozitivno pravo Republike Srbije ne predviđa formu zaključenja ugovora o zakupu, poslovna praksa i modus operandi pravnih lica u Srbiji je takva da je pisana forma komercijalnih ugovora o zakupu neophodna, najviše zbog plaćanja zakupa, utvrđivanja poreskih obaveza i potrebe računovodstva.
Usmena forma ugovora o zakupu se pretežno zadržala u sferi stambenog zakupa, zbog manje složenosti ugovora. Iako Zakon o planiranju i izgradnji (,, Službeni glasnik RS’’, br. 104/2016 i 9/2020) predviđa da ugovori o stambenom zakupu treba da budu zaključeni u pisanoj formi, ovakva odredba nije imperativne prirode i propisana je iz razloga prijavljivanju zakupca upravniku zgrade, kako bi učestvovao u troškovima održavanja i upravljanja zgradom.
Štaviše, veoma je teško, ponekada i nemoguće dokazati da ugovor koji nije sastavljen u pisanoj formi ima pravno dejstvo. Ako bi u ovakvim situacijama došlo do spora pred sudom, biće vam potrebno više dokaza, uključujući i dokazivanje svojih prava uz pomoć svedoka i druge dokumentacije, što bi značajno umanjilo vaše šanse da dobijete spor. Drugi važan razlog zaključivanja ugovora o zakupu u pisanoj formi je utvrđivanje poreza na prihod od zakupa, što je mnogo jednostavnije kada imate pisani ugovor o zakupu.
Imajte na umu, da je usmena forma ugovora o zakupu između zakupodavca i zakupca dovoljna, međutim da li je to najbolji način da se zaključi tako važan ugovor koji će verovatno trajati godinama?
Šta predstavlja klauzula izvršnosti?
Bez obzira na kvalitet odnosa između zakupodavca i zakupca u trenutku zaključenja Ugovora o zakupu, niko ne može predvideti nastanak potencijalnih problema u budućnosti (npr. narušeni odnosi). Šta će se desiti ukoliko zakupac jednostavno ne želi da se iseli iz poslovnog prostora ili stana nakon isteka zakupa? Da li će biti potrebno da podnesete tužbu za iseljenje i samim tim prihvatite činjenicu da sudski postupak može trajati nekoliko godina?
Naravno da ne. Postoji dosta lakši i efikasniji način rešavanja problema.
Naime, preporučljivo je da zakupodavac uvek predvidi klauzulu izvršnosti u Ugovoru o zakupu i da istu solemnizuje pred javnim beležnikom. Na taj način, ugovor o zakupu će proizvoditi pravno dejstvo, i može se upisati u evidenciju katastra nepokretnosti. Što je još važnije, ako ugovor o zakupu bude raskinut, ili postane ništav, a zakupac se ne iseli iz zakupljene nepokretnosti, zakupodavac može pokrenuti izvršni postupak pred nadležnim javnim izvršiteljem, bez potrebe za pokretanjem sudskog postupka pred nadležnim sudom, a koji bi trajao godinama.
Iz gorenavedenog se može zaključiti da samo jedna mala klauzula u Ugovoru o zakupu i zanemarljivi troškovi javnog beležnika u vezi sa solemnizacijom ugovora mogu napraviti ogromnu razliku i uštedeti godine trajanja sudskih postupaka i sudskih troškova.
Ko je odgovoran za popravke i održavanje predmeta zakupa?
Komercijalni i stambeni zakupci imaju obavezu da održavaju zakupljene prostorije u prikladnom stanju. Komercijalni zakupac je odgovoran za većinu manjih popravki i održavanje, dok je zakupodavac dužan da održava fizičko stanje zgrade (zidove, krov, temelj, itd.) i zajedničke prostorije zgrade. Ovo takođe uključuje popravku strukturnih i glavnih sastavnih delova iznajmljenih prostorija, kao i sve zamene koje bi se smatrale kapitalnim izdacima.
S druge strane, stambeni zakupac ima manje obaveza u vidu popravke i održavanja prostorija od komercijalnog, i kao takav uvek treba da obavesti zakupodavca kada su potrebni radovi radi popravke i održavanja.
Bez obzira na gorenavedeno, radovi radi popravke i održavanja su u većini slučajeva podložni pregovorima i stoga ugovorne strane uvek treba da vode računa da jasno rasporede ove odgovornosti u Ugovoru o zakupu kako bi izbegle bilo kakvu nepredviđenu okolnost.
Potencijalni zakupci bi trebalo uvek pažljivo da pročitaju i razjasne sve nedoumice u vezi sa klauzulama koje diktiraju ko plaća troškove održavanja i popravke za zajedničke prostore, grejanje, vodu, lift, i klimatizaciju, vodovod, električne instalacije, opremu i mašine, deratizaciju, štetu prouzrokovanu najezdom štetočina, štetom nastalom od požara i drugim elementarnim nepogodama.
Ko je u obavezi da plati porez?
Iznajmljivanje nepokretnosti može biti unosan posao, posebno ako posedujete nepokretnost na nekoj od „ekskluzivnih“ lokacija u gradu. Prilikom iznajmljivanja nepokretnosti u obavezi ste da platite porez, koji se može razlikovati u zavisnosti od toga da li su zakupodavac i zakupac fizičko ili pravno lice i da li je pravno lice u sistemu PDV-a.
Kada nepokretnost izdaje u zakup pravno lice ili preduzetnik (koji je dužan da vodi poslovne knjige) koji nisu u sistemu PDV-a, ne postoji obaveza plaćanja poreza za izdavanje. U takvim situacijama dobit se smatra prihodom pravnog lica, odnosno preduzetnika, i oporezuje se kao dobit na kraju godine. S druge strane, ako je zakupodavac pravno lice ili preduzetnik u sistemu PDV-a, postoji obaveza plaćanja poreza po poreskoj stopi na zakup nepokretnosti. Postoji izuzetak propisan Zakonom o porezu na dodatu vrednost Republike Srbije u situaciji kada je fizičko lice zakupac nepokretnosti i istu iznajmljuje za potrebe stanovanja od pravnog lica koje je u sistemu PDV-a. U tom slučaju to pravno lice ima pravo na poresko oslobođenje bez prava na odbitak prethodnog poreza.
Kada je zakupodavac fizičko lice, obveznik je poreza na prihod od nepokretnosti. Poreska stopa na prihode od nepokretnosti iznosi 20% bruto prihoda, umanjena za normirane troškove od 25%. Zakupodavac je dužan da u roku od 30 dana od dana ostvarivanja prihoda podnese poresku prijavu Poreskoj upravi na čijoj teritoriji se nalazi nepokretnost koja se daje u zakup.
Pored toga, često se ugovara da prilikom zaključivanja Ugovora o zakupu, zakupac isplati depozit zakupodavcu u slučaju eventualne štete. Za preuzimanje depozita zakupodavac nije dužan da plati porez. Međutim, ako se zakupodavac i zakupac dogovore da će se iznos depozita koristiti kao naknada, ili deo naknade za određeni period, zakupodavac će biti u obavezi da po tom osnovu obračuna i plati porez.
Nadamo se da je ovaj članak bio od pomoći i da ste barem shvatili složenost ugovora o komercijalnom i stambenom zakupu. Za više informacija u vezi sa zakupom komercijalnog i stambenog prostora, kao i kompletnu pravnu pomoć u vezi sa tim, slobodno se obratite našim advokatima Urošu Đorđeviću (uros.djordjevic@zslaw.rs), Srđanu Zerdu (srdjan.zerdo@zslaw.rs), i Miroslavu Živanoviću (miroslav.zivanovic@zslaw.rs).
- Published in Insights
Insurance-based investment products – review of some legal issues
Since enactment of the new Insurance Law in 2015, insurance undertakings in Serbia are provided with opportunity to offer to their clients insurance products where sum of insurance is wholly or partially exposed to market fluctuations and policyholders assumes investment risk. Such products – sometimes referred to as „unit-linked insurance products“, are collectively known as „insurance based investment products“ under IDD and PRIIPS regulation on the EU level.
Although this is well known and highly sought after product on developed insurance markets of the EU, IBIPs have not yet achieved significant presence on the Serbian insurance market. Considering that this is a relatively new type of insurance on Serbian insurance market, our associate Nikola Filipović provided review of some key legal issues regarding insurance based investment products in his paper for „Tokovi Osiguranja“ academic journal.
The paper points out key differences between investment based and traditional life insurance. The key difference rises from right of the policyholder to choose investment funds, where the premium will be invested, which at the same time shifts investment risk to the policyholder. This is contrary to the traditional life insurance where investment risk is borne by the insurance undertaking. Following analysis of the position of the ECJ on legal qualification of such contracts (as insurance contracts), the paper points out different conduct recruitment that applied for distribution of investment products under MiFID regime and insurance products linked to investment product under IMD/Third Life Insurance Directive regime, concluding that such differences were one of the key impetuous behind reform of the conduct rules and adoption of the IDD.
Paper is available at:
For any questions or additional information on insurance – related matters, contact Nikola Filipović, nikola.filipovic@zslaw.rs , Ivan Ljubisavljević, ivan.ljubisavljevic@zslaw.rs or your regular contacts at the office.
Investicioni proizvodi osiguranja – osvrt na neka pravna pitanja
Od stupanja na snagu Zakona o osiguranju 2015. osiguravajuća društva u Srbiji imaju mogućnost da svojim klijentima ponude osigranja života u kojima vrednost osigurane sume stoji u direktnoj vezi sa vrednošću jedinice investicionog fonda u koje su, po izboru ugovarača osiguranja investirana premija. U pitanju su osiguranja koja se u praksi nazivaju nekada nazivaju „unit-linked“ osiguranja (i ako je „unit linked“ samo jedna od vrsta investicionih proizvoda osiguranja), a koja su na nivou EU su kolektivno definisana kao investicioni proizvodi osiguranja odnosno „insurance based investment products“ prema Direktivi 2016/97 (Direktiva o distribuciji osiguranja) i Uredbi 1268/2014 (Uredba o dokumentima sa ključnim informacijama za maloprodajne investicione proizvode i investicione proizvode osiugranja).
I ako je u pitanju dobro poznata (i veoma tražena) vrsta osiguranja na razvijenim tržištima EU, ovakva vrsta osiguranja još uvek nije široko rasprostranjena na tržištu Srbije. Budući da je u pitanju relativno nova vrsta osiguranja, naš saradnik Nikola Filipović, ukazao je na neke ključne pravne probleme koji se mogu javiti u vezi sa investicionim proizvodima osiguranja u stručnom radu za naučno-istraživački časopis „Tokovi Osiugranja“.
Na prvom mestu, ukazuje se na razlike između investicionih proizvoda osiguranja i tradicionalnih životnih osiguranja. Naime osnovna razlika proističe upravo iz prava koje ugovarač ove vrste osiguranja ima (da izabere fondove u koje želi da se investiraju sredstva od premije), usled čega ugovarač osiguranja preuzima na sebe investicioni rizik. Nasuprot ovome u tradicionalnim životnim osiguranjima ovaj rizik snosi osiguravajuće društvo. Kako je ESP zauzeo stav da su ovakvi ugovori (i ako hibridni, tj. delom osiguranje a delom investiciona usluga) po svojoj pravnoj prirodi ipak jesu ugovori o osiguranju, došlo je do neobične situacije u kojoj su se na suštinski iste finansijske proizvode primenjuje različiti regulatorno-pravni režim u zavisnosti od njihove formalne kvalifikacije. Upravo su razlike između pravnog režima predviđenog za finansijske usluge (MiFID) i režima predviđenog za usluge osiguranja (IMD i Treća Direktiva Životnog osiguranja) bile jedan od osnovnih razloga za sveobuhvatnu reformu pravila tržišnog ponašanja u sektoru osiguranja i usvajanje Direktive o distribuciji osiguranja.
Ukoliko imate bilo kakvih pitanja ili su Vam potrebne dodatne informacije možete se obratiti Nikoli Filipoviću, nikola.filipovic@zslaw.rs , Ivanu Ljubisavljeviću, ivan.ljubisavljevic@zslaw.rs ili Vašem redovnom kontaktu u kancelariji.
- Published in Insights
Esports and the very long arm of the law
The biggest issues facing professional players in the Republic of Serbia

Esports, for the uninitiated, are multiplayer video games played competitively for spectators, currently the most famous examples include Dota 2, Counter-Strike GO, LoL, Fornite, Overwatch and World of Tanks. In the recent years the Esport scene has slowly abandoned the premises of internet cafes and weekend Lan parties and has taken to the spotlight by being broadcast worldwide through prominent television channels such as ESPN and through platforms of newcomers in the digital age of entertainment such as Twitch, Youtube and Facebook Live. Back in 2016, Belgrade was host to the World championship in CS:GO with a humbling prize pool of 100.000 EUR. By comparison, just last year the prize pool for the Dota 2 International championship was in excess of 34.000.000,00 USD not to mention Epic games investing a total of 100.000.000,00 USD in Fortnite tournaments all across the world. One thing is for certain, the landscape of entertainment is changing drastically and the younger generations will be its torchbearers.
During this year’s COVID-19 pandemic, with the large absence of traditional sports coverage, Esports came out on top as being one of the most watched forms of entertainment available. To get a clear picture of the European Esports market, Deloitte ran two extensive surveys focused on the different segments of the European Esports industry, the direct market participants and company representatives from across the industry, both of which concluded in June 2020. In these findings it is worth to note that 77% of the organizations invested in Esports stated that they managed to increase their revenues compared to 2018 accompanied by a boost in user numbers, which was classified as sign of a dynamically developing industry. Furthermore, the market for mergers and acquisitions in this area had a cash flow of 1.7 billion EUR in global transaction volume in the last year.
But what does this all mean for the professional players, managers, team owners and even the viewers? The legal implications of Esports have been ignored in most part by state authorities but that is bound to change in the coming years with the unrelenting and exponential growth of the industry. The lawmakers will have their hands full with issues such as copyright – video games are protected under copyright law and as such broadcasting of the tournament or live streaming on the internet, without the prior approval of the copyright holder i.e. the publisher, might be considered an infringement on the author’s exploitation rights, not to mention the fact that the publisher can alter the rules of the game by altering its source code. Gambling laws – an increasing number of video games have in game purchases called “loot-boxes” where the rewards are randomized but are acquired with real money, while certain jurisdictions such as China or Belgium have already designated these purchases as gambling or have out right banned them, most of the European states have yet to address this issue.
Employment laws – different Esports have different formats for competing, some are individual (Street Fighter V) while some are team based (League of Legends, Overwatch) with Esport players often being under contract with a professional Esports team. Currently players are typically employed under a “provision of services contract”, with the players being hired as a physical person / executor of work and paid a fee or as an entrepreneur having to issue invoices to their teams. There are instances where video game publisher required a specific type of contract between player and team, for instance, Riot games, required all NA and EU League Championship Series players to be employed by a team from 2017 onwards as a pre-condition to be eligible for a tournament. In contrast to executors of work i.e. contractors, players who are hired as employees are paid a salary. Whether a player is classed as an employee or a contractor can have real impact on both the player and the team in terms of obligations and money. Generally speaking, employees have higher legal protection and employers have higher obligations and both employer and employee usually pay higher taxes. Team draft changes are extremely common in Esports and with the issue of constant employment change, visas for competing in tournaments held in foreign countries (which can vary depending if the country in question recognizes Esports as a sport) there are numerous other issues which have already been regulated for traditional sports such as minimum wage, paid holidays, sick pay, etc.
The question of employment transfers over to the most pressing issue for upcoming professional players – taxes. Professional players must be aware of the tax implications of their earnings, including how their tournament winnings, player salaries, streaming income/donations and sponsorship funds are typically taxed.
Before delving into these issues it must be analysed if existing sport regulation is applicable to professional gamers. Under the Law on Sports of Republic of Serbia a professional athlete is defined as a person who is engaged in sports activity as his only or basic occupation, or an athlete who has the status of a professional athlete in accordance with the sports rules of the competent international sports federation, whereas sports activities are all forms of physical and mental activity which, through unorganized or organized participation, aim to express or improve physical fitness and spiritual well-being, create social relationships or achieve results in competitions of all levels. By this broad definition, which leans on the internationally recognized standards for sports, it can be concluded that professional gamers can be treated as athletes if they fulfil the above mentioned criteria.
As stipulated by the Law on Sports a professional athlete establishes an employment relationship with a sports organization by concluding an employment contract, for a definite period of time, with a maximum of five years. This employment contract must determine the salary and other incomes of the professional athlete in accordance with relevant laws. Other incomes of a professional athlete or gamer are not characterized as salary, meaning that they are taxed differently. The salary tax is 10% on top of the contributions for social security insurance which can amount to an additional 36%. Any winnings the professional gamer achieves throughout tournaments and competitions is taxed at a rate of 20% where the gross income of the winnings is reduced beforehand by 50% on the account of standard costs, all under the prior condition that this type of income must be paid by sports organizations, associations or federations. Income not paid by sports organizations, sports associations or federations is taxed at a rate of 20% and standard costs which are deducted represent 20% of the gross income.
As a general rule, the location of a specific tournament dictates which tax laws are applicable to a particular tournament prize pool. As an example, the 2016 Dota 2 “The International” was located in the U.S. and boasted a $20.7 million prize pool. Therefore, the players that won a portion of this prize pool, even those who were not U.S. residents, were subject to United States federal income tax on these winnings. With Esports the question where the outcome-defining activities manifest themselves becomes extremely relevant in determining which jurisdiction has the right of taxation on income made from tournament winnings. This is especially relevant in online tournaments. Are the income generating activities performed in the country where the player takes part in the competition, the country in which the team is established, in in the country where the servers are located or in the country of residence of the tournament organizer? A professional gamer who is a Serbian resident is subject to taxation in Serbia on their worldwide income which means that tournament winnings awarded in foreign countries can lead to potential double taxation. It is of note that Serbia has entered into a significant number of multilateral and bilateral treaties based on the OECD Model Tax Convention in order to avoid this very issue. In practice, this means that cross-border European Esports employers and professional players will need legal and tax advice to ensure they have the proper employer tax setup.
Professional gamers are also profiting from new forms of compensation, including sponsorships and income from streaming through partnerships with streaming websites and donations from their viewers all of which are subject to different types of taxation. In regards to donations, it is worth pointing out that the money received as a donation from the same person, up to the amount of 100,000 RSD in one calendar year, is excluded from taxes while any amount exceeding this is subject to a 2,5% gift tax. The issue which arises is how is a streamer to know when one person has donated funds which exceed the legal minimum when the donations are conducted through online aliases which make the donator practically anonymous to the streamer.
Sponsorship fall into a different category on their own. When a sponsor gives a certain amount of money to the professional gamer or their team, who will in return publicly and in an agreed manner make it known that they are sponsored by a specific brand, this will be regarded as a transaction of services provided by the professional gamer or his team to the sponsor, which will then be subject to VAT. However, for the sponsors themselves it is relevant that the costs of advertising and propaganda are recognized as an expense in full in the tax balance.
Similar to any other type of income, benefits which professional gamers receive from their teams or sponsor are also taxed based on the fair market value of the benefit. For example, if a gamer received free air miles or products from a sponsor, they will be taxed based on the fair market value of those miles or products.
Even though the situation currently might not demand it, it is apparent that when negotiating the terms of their next gaming contract, professional gamers as well as their teams should utilise the advice of their tax advisor or legal professionals to determine the best way to structure the various forms of compensation they receive. In this regard our law office, along with the assistance of ZSTAX, provides the full scope of services necessary to ensure optimal legal security in the coming years.
Esport i vrlo dugačka ruka zakona
Najveći problemi sa kojima se suočavaju profesionalni Esport igrači u Republici Srbiji
Esport, za neupućene, su multiplayer igre koje se igraju u takmičarskom okruženju za gledaoce. Trenutno najpopularnije igre u ovoj sferi su Dota 2, Counter-Strike: GO, LoL, Fortnite, Overwatch i World of Tanks. U prethodnim godinama Esport scena je polako napustila igraonice i lokalne Lan turnire i našla se u centru pažnje emitovanjem na prominentnim kanalima kao što su ESPN i na platformama pridošlica digitalnog doba zabave kao što su Twitch, Youtube i Facebook Live. Još u 2016. godini Beograd je bio domaćin Svetskog šampionata u CS:GO koji je imao skromni nagradni fond od 100.000 EUR. Poređenja radi, samo prošle godine, nagradni fond za Dota 2 Međunarodni šampionat “The International” iznosio je preko 34.000.000,00 USD. Pri tom ne treba ni spomenuti da je Epic games investirao ukupno 100.000.000,00 USD u Fortnite turnire organizovane širom sveta. Jedna stvar je sigurna, pejzaž interaktivne zabave se menja drastično i mlađe generacije su njegovi pioniri.
Za vreme ovogodišnje COVID-19 pandemije praćene primetnim odsustvom prenosa tradicionalnih sportova, Esport se probio kao jedan od najgledanijih oblika zabave. U cilju dobijanja jasne slike evropskog Esport tržišta, Deloitte je sproveo dve ekstenzivne studije koje su bile fokusirane na različite aspekte evropske Esport industrije, prvo na direktne učesnike na tržištu a zatim i na predstavnike kompanija širom industije, obe studije su završene u junu 2020. godine. U nalazima ovih studija značajno je ukazati da je 77% organizacija investiranih u Esport navela da uspevaju da povećaju svoje prihode u poređenju sa 2018. godinom uz dodatno povećanjee broja korisnika, što je klasifikovano kao znak industrije koja je praćena dinamičnim razvojem. Dodatno, tržište za M&A transakcije u ovoj oblasti u toku prethodne godine videlo je protok kapitala u iznosu od 1.7 milijardi EUR u transakcijama na globalnom nivou.
Ali šta ovo znači za profesionalne igrače, menadžere, vlasnike timova čak i gledaoce? Pravne implikacije Esporta su dugo vremena bile ignorisane od strane državnih vlasti ali i to je neizbežno da se promeni u predstojećim godinama usled neprestanog i eksponencijalnog rasta ove industrije. Zakonodavci će imati pune ruke sa pitanjima kao što su autorska prava – video igre su zaštićene putem autorskih prava i kao takve emitovanje turnira ili streamovanje uživo putem internet, bez prethodno pribavljene saglasnosti nosioca autorskog prava tj. izdavača, može predstavljati povredu autorovih prava na komercijalno iskorišćavanje dela, ovo i bez da spomenemo da izdavač može menjati pravila igre izmenama source koda. Zakoni o igrama na sreću – sve veći broj video igara sadrži mogućnost za dodatne transakcije unutar samih igara koje su kolokvijalno zovu “loot-boxes” a koje sadrže nagrade koje su nasumično dodeljene i koje nagrade mogu da variraju u svojoj vrednosti po kojoj se preprodaju putem eksternih web siteova. Pojedine zemlje kao što su Belgija i Kina već su svojim zakonima okarakterisale ove vrste transakcija kao podvrstu igara na sreću, ili su ih čak izričito zabranile, dok većina evropskih država tek treba da adresira ovo pitanje.
Radno pravo – različiti Esportovi imaju različite formate za takmičenje, neki su individualni (Street Fighter V) dok su neki timski (League of Legends, Overwatch) gde su profesionalni igrači uglavnom pod ugovorom zaključenim sa profesionalnim Esport timom. Trenutno igrači su tipično angažovani putem ugovora o pružanju usluga, gde su igrači najčešće angažovani u vidu izvršioca posla za šta im se isplaćuje naknada ili u vidu preduzetnika u kom slučaju izdaju račun timu za svoje usluge. Postoje slučajevi gde izdavači Esport video igara zahtevaju posebnu vrstu ugovora između igrača i tima. Primera radi, Riot games od 2017. godine zahteva od svih igrača koji učestvuju u Severnoameričkoj i Evropskoj Seriji Lige Šampiona da bude zaposleni od strane svog tima kako bi bili kvalifikovani da učestvuje na turnirima. U odnosu na igrače angažovane kao izvršioce posla, igrači koji su zaposleni u timu igraju za platu. Da li je igrač klasifikovan tj angažovan kao zaposleni ili na neki drugi način može imati veliki uticaj kako na samog igrača tako i na tim u pogledu obaveza i novca. Uopšteno govoreći, zaposleni imaju veću pravnu zaštitu a poslodavci veće obaveze a zaposleni i poslodavac zajedno plaćaju veće poreze i doprinose u odnosu na druge vidove angažovanja. Promene postave timova su ekstremno česte u Esportu i zajedno za problemom stalne promene zaposlenja, vizama za učestvovanje na turnirima koji se održavaju u stranim zemljama (koje mogu da variraju u zavisnosti od toga da li država domaćin priznaje Esport kao spor) postoji bezbroj drugih problema koji su već regulisani u tradicionalnom sportovima kao što su minimalna zarada, plaćeni odmori, prekovremeni rad, bolovanje itd.
Pitanje zaposlenja se prenosi na možda najbitnije pitanje za buduće profesionalne igrače – porezi. Profesionalni igrači moraju biti svesni poreskih implikacija njihove zarade, što uključuje znanje o tome kako se obračunava i plaća porez na njihove nagrade sa turnira, zarade, prihodi/donacije dobijene putem streamovanja i sponzorstva.
Pre nego što se upustimo u analizu ovih problema moramo postaviti pitanje da li je postojeća regulativa sporta primenjiva na profesionalne Esport igrače. Prema Zakonu o sportu Republike Srbije profesionalni sportista je sportista koji se bavi sportskom aktivnošću kao jedinim ili osnovnim zanimanjem i drugi sportista koji ima status profesionalnog sportiste u skladu sa sportskim pravilima nadležnog međunarodnog sportskog saveza, gde se sportske aktivnosti definišu kao svi oblici fizičke i umne aktivnosti koji, kroz neorganizovano ili organizovano učešće, imaju za cilj izražavanje ili poboljšanje fizičke spremnosti i duhovnog blagostanja, stvaranje društvenih odnosa ili postizanje rezultata na takmičenjima svih nivoa. Prema ovoj dosta široko postavljenoj definiciji koja se u određenoj meri oslanja na međunarodne standarde, profesionalni Esport igrači mogu se tretirati kao sportisti ukoliko ispunjavaju gore navedene kriterijume.
Kao što je navedeno Zakonom o sportu profesionalni sportista zasniva radni odnos sa sportskom organizacijom zaključenjem ugovora o radu, na određeno vreme, najduže do pet godina. Ovim ugovorom o radu mora biti utvrđena zarada i drugi prihodi profesionalnog sportiste u skladu sa zakonom. Drugi prihodi profesionalnog sportiste i Esport igrača nisu okarakterisani kao zarada, što znači da se oporezuju po drugom osnovu. Porez na zaradu je 10% povrh doprinosa za obavezno socijalno osiguranje koji mogu iznositi dodatnih 36%. Sve nagrade koje Esport igrač osvoji kroz učešće na turnirima i kroz druga takmičenja oporezuju se kao prihodi sportista po stopi od 20% gde se priznaju normirani troškovi od 50% putem umanjenja bruto prihoda sve pod uslovom da ova primanja isplaćuju sportske organizacije, udruženja ili savezi. Prihodi koji nisu isplaćeni od strane sportskih organizacija, udruženja ili saveza oporezuje se takođe po stopi od 20% kao dodatni prihod ali priznati normirani troškovi iznose 20% na bruto prihod.
Kao opšte pravilo lokacija pojedinačnog turnira dikitira koji se poreski zakoni primenjuju na određene nagrade iz nagradnog fonda. Kao primer, svetsko takmičenje iz Dota 2 “The international” koje je 2016. godine održano u Sjedinjenim Američkim Državama imalo je nagradni fond koji je bio nešto preko 20 miliona USD. Igrači koji su osnovjili deo ove nagrade, čak i oni koji nisu državljani SAD, bili su u obavezi da plate federalni porez na dohodak koji naplaćuje SAD. Kada je u pitanju Esport pitanje gde se ispoljavaju radnje po osnovu kojih se postiže određeni rezultat u takmičenju postaje izuzetno relevantno prilikom utvrđivanja koja jurisdikcija ima pravo da oporezuje nagrade dobijene za pobedničke plasmane na takmičenjima. Ovo je naročito relevantno kada se turniri održavaju online. Da li se aktivnosti koje predstavljaju izvor prihoda preduzimaju u mestu gde se profesionalni igrač nalazi prilikom učešća na turniru, u državi u kojoj je tim osnovan, u državi u kojoj se nalaze serveri preko kojih se takmičenje održava ili u državi porekla organizatora turnira? Profesionalni igrač koji je državljanin Republike Srbije u obavezi je da izmiri porez prema Republici Srbiji na sve nagrade osvojene širom sveta što u praksi znači da nagrade osvojene u stranim zemljama mogu voditi do potencijalnog dvostrukog oporezivanja. Bitno je naglasiti je da je Republika Srbija potpisnica značajnog broja multilateralnih i bilaterlanih sporazuma o izbegavanju dvostrukog oporezivanja koji su bazirani na O.E.C.D. modelu kao i da je potpisnica Multilateralne konvencije koja je suštinski, kada je reč o Srbiji počela da se primenjuje od oktobra 2018. godine, sve u cilju regulisanja ovoga problema. U praksi, ovo znači da Esport igrači i njihovi poslodavci moraju zatražiti pravni i poreski savet kako bi osigurali optimalan poreski tretman koji je u svačijem zajedničkom interesu.
Profesionalni igrači takođe profitiraju putem drugih oblika kompenzacije uključujući sponzorstva i prihode od streamovanja kroz partnerstva sa websajtovima koji pružaju usluge streamovanja a koji su svi podložni različitim poreskim tretmanima. U pogledu domacija prilikom streamovanja, bitno je ukazati na to da novac koji je primljen na ime donacije od strane istog fizičkog lica i koji ne prelazi iznos od 100.000 RSD u jednoj kalendarskoj godini ne predstavlja oporeziv prihod dok iznos koji prelazi ovu granicu podleže porezu na poklon od 2,5% i čiji je obveznik poklonoprimac. Problem koji se ovde javlja je kako da osoba koja streamuje svoj sadržaj stekne saznanje o tome kada je jedan donator premašio navedeni zakonski maksimum kada se donacije sprovode putem lako promenjivih online nadimaka koji čine donatora praktično anonimnim.
Sponzorstva spadaju u potpuno drugačiju kategoriju. Kada sponzor daje primaocu sponzorstva određeni novčani iznos, a primalac sponzorstva zauzvrat javno i na ugovoreni način ističe da je sponzorisan od strane sponzora i na drugi način reklamira sponzora, radi se o prometu usluga koji primalac sponzorstva vrši sponzoru, a koji je predmet oporezivanja PDV. Za sponozora je od značaja da troškovi reklame i propagande priznaju se kao rashod u poreskom bilansu u celosti.
Slično kao i drugi osnovi prihoda, benefiti koje profesionalni igrač primi od svog tima ili sponzora takođe se oporezuju po njihovoj tržišnoj vrednosti. Primera radi, ukoliko profesionalni ograč budu obezbeđeni letovi od strane tima ili proizvodi od sponzora, oni će biti oporezivani na način da će se kao poreska osnovica uzeti tržišna vrednost troškova leta ili proizvoda a obveznik poreza biće sam profesionalni igrač.
Iako trenutna situacija možda to ne zahteva, evidentno je da prilikom pregovaranja uslova njihovog sledećeg ugovora, profesionalni igrači ali i njihovi timovi trebaju da uposle podršku njihovih računovođa ili pravnih timova kako bi utvrdili koji je najbolji način da se struktuiraju različite forme prihoda koji se mogu javiti u budućnosti. U ovome pogledu, naša advokatska kancelarija, zajedno sa asistencijom ZSTAX pruža potpun set usluga neophodnih da se omogući optimala prava sigurnost u predstojećim godinama.
- Published in Insights
Market Conduct Regulation in Serbian Insurance Sector
What is market conduct regulation?

Market conduct is second pillar of ongoing regulatory reform in the EU insurance law. While the “macro-economic” quantitative and qualitative prudential requirements are addressed through the rules established by the Solvency II directive, the “micro-economic” conduct risks are addressed through rules established by the Insurance Distribution Directive.
Market conduct regulation provides supervisors with tools to assess behavior of the insurance distributors (insurance companies and intermediaries) in order to tackle consumer detriment at an early stage, rather than only react following the emergence of problems.
For insurance distributors, market conduct regulation imposes completely new and extensive “customer facing” obligations (fair treatment of the customer, acting in accordance with the client’s best interest, assessing demands and needs of the customer, pre-contractual information duties, maintaining and operating effective Product Oversight and Governance policies and procedures etc.)
Market conduct requirements in Serbian Insurance Regulation
Current Serbian Insurance Law imposes three key conduct requirements:
- Provide policyholder with pre contractual information mandated by the Articles 82-84 of the Insurance Law;
- Maintaining effective mechanisms ensure the protection of rights and interests of the insured, policyholders, insurance beneficiaries and injured parties, (as determined by the Decision on the NBS on Manner of Protecting the Rights and Interests of Insurance Service Consumers);
- Pursuing activities in accordance with law, general acts, business policies, rules of the insurance and actuarial profession, good business practices and business ethics, (which includes adopted codes of professional ethics, codes of conduct and recommendation and guidelines adopted by the Supervisor);
The Guidelines of the National Bank on minimal standards of conduct and good practice of insurance market participants – Implementation of the IDD in Serbia
The Guidelines on minimal standards of conduct and good practice of insurance market participants introduce basic concepts from the IDD. In accordance with its international obligations, Serbia will be required to implement insurance acquis including the IDD, however publication of the Guidelines by the National Banks of Serbia seems to have caught many insurance undertakings somewhat by surprise. Through adoption and publication of the Guidelines National Bank of Serbia clearly pointed out that market conduct will be one of the focuses of the supervisor in the future, and stated its expectations (what constitutes good business practice) from the market participants.
Key market conduct changes introduced by the Guideline
- Knowledge and expertise – essentially this is introduction of the continuous professional training requirements from the IDD. Once IDD is fully implemented all distributors (including employees of the insurance companies) will have to attend minimum of 15 hours per year of the professional training;
- General principles of market conduct – distributors should conduct fairly, professionally and in the best interest of customers, these open norms can be used to assess wide both conduct as well as internal processes and policies of the insurance distributors;
- Enhanced information duties – product information document design, clear distinction between general and specific terms and conditions and pre-contractual information documents;
- Marketing of insurance products – prohibition of use of incorrect or misleading promises, misrepresentation and concealment of information, usage of professional terms etc.
- Product oversight and governance – perhaps the most complex and far-reaching of all requirements introduced. Insurance manufacturers are required to operate and maintain effective product oversight and government policies and arrangements which include identification of the target market, testing of insurance products and review of the products;
- Focus on distribution strategies and choice of distribution channels – insurance companies will have to apply certain level of diligence when choosing distribution channel and assess whether the distributors act in accordance with the product oversight and governance policy of the manufacturer, in particular whether the product is distributed to the identified target market;
- Conflict of interest rules – assessment of policies and inducements schemes both internally for employees, and externally when distributing through indirect channels;
Which departments within the insurance companies are affected?
Without doubt the new rules will have the most serious impact on compliance departments. Broad nature of the conduct rules requires from compliance departments not just to be on the outside of the business development process, but essential element in the decision making process, in particular given regulatory focus on the design and development of the new products, before they are offered on the market (identification of the target market, choice of distribution strategy etc.)
However, compliance departments are not the only one affected, and other departments should be aware, that the broad nature of the conduct rules affects them as well. HR departments should be involved regarding training and competences of the employees, risk management given the fact that conduct rules represent legal risks that need to be properly managed, product development, marketing and sale for obvious reasons, but also ultimately the managing board due to potential financial fines and significant reputational risks associated with misconduct and mis-selling.
Proper management of the new legal risks – how to adjust to the changes in market conduct rules?
Insurance companies (because they will be most significantly affected by the changes), but also other distributors who are in scope of the new rules, should begin the evaluation process of their internal policies and procedures (gap analysis) in order to assess which conduct rules will most significantly affect their daily operations, and to provide their in house lawyers and compliance departments with support and adequate information in order to better comprehend the new conduct regime.
This is particularly important given soft law nature of the Guidelines. It allows insurance companies to identify legal requirements which could be hardly attainable, overly burdensome or with little effect on overall level of consumer protection and clearly communicate issues to the state and the supervisor, before rules become “hard law”.
Scope of application – who is affected by the market conduct rules?
Insurance companies, insurance agents and brokers, banks and financial leasing companies. In a brief, if you are part of the insurance distribution chain, it is very likely you will be affected by the market conduct rules.
For any additional questions regarding this topic, please follow our announcements and/or contact Nikola Filipović, nikola.filipovic@zslaw.rs, Ivan Ljubisavljevic, ivan.ljubisavljevic@zslaw.rs, or your regular contact at the Zivkovic Samardzic law office.
Pravila tržišnog ponašanja u srpskom pravu osiguranja
Šta su pravila tržišnog ponašanja?
Pravila tržišnog ponašanja su jedan od dva pravca reforme evropskog prava osiguranja. Dok Direktiva Solventnost II reguliše makro-ekonomska pitanja, kvalitativne i kvantitativne zahteve u vezi sa bonitetom osiguravajućeg društva, Direktiva o distribuciji osiguranja je usmerena na „mikro-ekonomska“ pitanja i rizike koji se javljaju kao posledica odnosa osiguravajućeg društva prema ugovaračima osiguranja (tržišno ponašanjе).
Pravila tržišnog ponašanja daju nadzornom organu mogućnost da ispita ponašanje osiguravajućeg društva (i drugih distributera osiguranja), odnosno njihov odnos prema klijentima, sa ciljem da preventivno deluje i spreči nastanak neželjenih situacija u kojima korisnici osiguranja mogu biti oštećeni, umesto da samo reaguje na neželjene sitaucije nakon što se dogode.
Za distributere osiguranja, pravila tržišnog ponašanja nameću poptuno nove, opsežne i sveobuhvatne obaveze u njihovom kontaktu i odnosu sa ugovaračima osiguranja i osiguranicima (fer pošten i transparentan odnos prema klijentima, postupanje u skladu sa najboljim interesima klijenta, procena zahteva i potreba klijenta, informisanje klijenata pre zaključenja ugovora) ali isto tako i nove organizacione zahteve (usvajanje i sprovođenje efikasne politike nadzora i upravljanja prozvodima).
Pravila tržišnog ponašanja u Zakonu o Osiguranju
Zakon o osiguranju propisuje tri ključne obaveze koje potpadaju pod pravila tržišnog ponašanja:
- Članovi 82-84 Zakona o osiguranju propisuju obavezu predugovornog informisanja ugovarača osiguranja;
- Član 15 Zakona o osiguranju propisuje obavezu obezbeđenja zaštite prava i interesa osiguranika, ugovarača osiguranja, korisnika osiguranja i trećih oštećenih lica, (ove obaveze detaljnije su propisane Odlukom NBS o načinu zaštite prava i interesa korisnika usluge osiguranja);
- Član 19 Zakona o osiguranju propisuje obavezu obavljanja delatnosti u skladu sa zakonom, opštim aktima, aktima poslovne politike, pravilima struke osiguranja i aktuarske struke, dobrim poslovnim običajima i poslovnom etikom, (što obuhvata usvojene kodekse profesionalne etike, kodekse i pravilnike ponašanja kao i preporuke i smernice usvojene od strane nadzornog organa);
Smernica Narodne Banke Srbije o minimalnim standardima ponašanja i dobroj poslovnoj praksi učesnika na tržištu osiguranja – prvi korak ka implementaciji Direktive o distribuciji osiguranja u Srbiji
Smernica Narodne Banke Srbije o minimalnim standardima ponašanja i dobroj poslovnoj praksi učesnika na tržištu osiguranja uvodi po prvi put u pravni život osnovne koncepte i pojmove iz Direktive o distribuciji osiguranja. U skladu sa međunarodno preuzetim obavezama, Srbija ima obavezu da uskladi svoje propise sa direktivama EU iz oblasti prava osiguranja, uključujući i Direktivu o distribuciji osiguranja, međutim čini se da je objavljivanje smernica od strane NBS zateklo mnoga osiguravajuća društva nespremnim. Kroz usvajanje i objavljivanje Smernica Narodna Banka Srbije je jasno stavila do znanja da će pravila tržišnog ponašanja biti jedan od fokusa nadzora u narednom periodu, i definisala svoje viđenje dobrih poslovnih praksi na tržištu osiguranja.
Ključne promene koje Smernica donosi:
- Znanje i stručnost – suštinski ovo je prvi korak u uvođenju obaveze kontinuiranog profesionalnog usavršavanja za zaposlene u osiguravajućim društvima. Direktiva predviđa obavezu, najmanje 15 sati godišnje kontinurane obuke za sve distributere (uključujući i zaposlene u osiguravajućim društvima);
- Opšti principi tržišnog ponašanja – od distributere sa zahteva fer i pošteno poslovanje u najboljem interesu korisnika. Ove opšte norme mogu služiti kao osnova za procenu kako neposrednog odnosa prema korisnicma, tako i za ocenu internih procesa i politika distributera osiguranja;
- Predugovorno informisanje – predlog dokumenta predugovornog informisanja, povlačenje jasne razlike između opštih i posebnih uslova osiguranja i obaveze predugovornog informisanja;
- Oglašavanje – zabrana upotrebe netačnih obećanja ili informacija koje dovode u zabludu, pogrešnog predstavljanja informacija ili prikrivanja informacija, upotrebe profesionalnih izraza itd.;
- Nadzor i upravljanje proizvodima osiguranja – verovatno najkompleksniji i najdalekosežniji od svih zahteva. Proizvođači osiguranja (a to su osiguravajuća društva i pod određenim uslovima posrednici osiguranja) imaju obavezu da uvedu i sprovode efikasnu politiku nadzora i upravljanja proizvodima osiguranja, što uključuje pitanja identifikacije ciljnog tržišta, testiranje proizvoda osiguranja kao i postupake korigovanja;
- Regulatorni fokus na distributivne strategije i izbor kanala prodaje – osiguravajuća društva moraju pažljivo odabrati prikladni distributivni kanal i analizirati da li distributeri koje su odabrali postupaju u skladu sa politikom nadzora i upravljanja proizvodima, naročito da li se proizvod plasira identifikovanom ciljnom tržištu;
- Pravila o sukobu interesa – obuhvataju kako direktnu tako i indirektnu prodaju. Od osiguravajućih društava se očekuje da procene kako interni (za zaposlene) tako i eksterni (za distributere) programi stimulacije i naknade mogu uticati na interese klijenata;
Na koja odeljenja u okviru osiguravajućeg društva će nova pravila najviše uticati?
Bez sumnje, nova pravila tržišnog ponašanja najviše će opteretiti (već veoma opterećena) odeljenja za usklađenost poslovanja. Priroda pravila tržišnog ponašanja takođe znači da odeljenja za usklađenost poslovanja više ne mogu biti na marginama poslovnog procesa, već da se moraju transformisati u jedan od ključnih faktora prilikom donošenja poslovnih odluka, naročito imajući u vidu novi regulatorni fokus na dizajn osiguranja pre nego što se proizvod uopšte ponudi osiguranicima na tržištu.
Međutim neće se samo odeljenja za usklađenost poslovanja pred izazovom. U proces usklađivanja trebala bi biti uključena i HR odeljenja, usled zahteva usmerenih na razvoj kompetencija i obuku zaposlenih, sektor za upravljanje rizikom usled činjenica da pravila tržišnog ponašanja predstavljaju nove pravne rizike koji zahtevaju kvalitativnu ocenu, sektori prodaje, marketinga i razvoj proizvoda iz očiglednih razloga, ali isto tako i izvršni odbor u krajnjoj instanci zbog potencijalnih finansijskih sankcija i reputacionih posledica koje mogu nastati usled nepoštovanja pravila tržišnog ponašanja.
Upravljanje novim pravnim rizicima – kako se prilagoditi izmenama u pravnom okviru?
Osiguravajuća društva (zato što nova pravila najviše utiču na njih), ali isto tako i drugi distributeri, trebali bi da se upuste u procenu svojih internih politika i procedura (gep analiza) kako bi ocenili koja će pravila tržišnog ponašanja najviše uticati na njihovu svakodnevnu delatnost i poslovanje (zavisno od portfolia, distributivnih kanala, prodajne mreže, već usvojenih politika i internih akata), kao i da svojim pravnicima i odeljenjima za usklađenost pruže podršku kroz adekvatne informacije i obuke o novim pravilima, u skladu sa strateškim (forward-looking) pristupom i evolucijom uloge sektora usklađenosti u poslovnim procesima.
Ovo je naročito važno imajući u vidu pravnu prirodu Smernica. Osiguravajuća društva imaju priliku da identifikuju obaveze koje se teško mogu sprovesti u praksi ili jednostavno premalo doprinose nivou zaštite ugovarača osiguranja i osiguranika, da zauzmu stav po pitanju onih obaveza koje mogu biti suviše veliko opterećenje za indsutriju osiguranja pre nego što takve obaveze postanu deo zakona.
Domašaj primene novih pravila – na koga se odnose nova pravila tržišnog ponašanja?
Nova pravila tržišnog ponašanja odnose se na osiguravajuća društva, zastupnike i posrednike osiguranja, banke, davaoce finansijskog lizinga. Ukratko rečeno, ukoliko je subjekat deo lanca distribucije osiguranja, deo ili većina novih pravila tržišnog ponašanja će se primenjivati i uticati na poslovanje.
Za sva dodatna pitanja u vezi sa ovom temom, pratite naše objave, i/ili kontaktirajte Nikolu Filipovića, nikola.filipovic@zslaw.rs, Ivana Ljubisavljevića, ivan.ljubisavljevic@zslaw.rs ili vaš redovan kontakt u Advokatskoj Kancelariji Živković Samardžić.
- Published in Insights
Between the waves
An overview of the real estate sector in Serbia

As the summer period of 2020 quickly draws to a close, the uncertainty of autumn and the prospect of a second wave of COVID-19 outbreak gives rise to the necessity of ascertaining the current situation of the real estate sector and the projections for its possible future development.
One of the most important changes brought about by the necessity of social distancing is the greater emphasis on digitalization and flow of information. The frontrunner in this movement has certainly been the Republic Geodetic Authority (RGA) by implementing the Integrated Geospatial Information Framework which will assist in bridging the geospatial digital divide with other countries and secure socio-economic prosperity providing foreign investors with more opportunity, security and clarity in forming real estate investment trusts or groups aimed at the Serbian real estate market. As on the macro level, the day to day micro level has also been the recipient of the benefits of digitalization. Certified attorneys now have the ability to digitally acquire excerpts from the real estate cadastre i.e. legal proof of ownership, submit all requests which are related to changes of rights and titles on real estate, schedule meetings with officials concerning ongoing cases, access the digital noticeboard where all of the decisions passed by the RGA are posted, access the database of planning documents etc.
All of the abovementioned will undoubtedly have the desired effect of considerably speeding up real estate transactions and lowering their costs to the benefits of our clients. The effect of these macro and micro stimuluses can already be discerned from the report published by the RGA on the real estate market in the first half of 2020. One of the most important conclusions from the report is that even though that the overall transactions have been down 13% compared to the same period last year, which can be attributed to the 2-month standstill period where almost no transactions have been concluded due to the state of emergency, the overall monetary funds exchanged in these transactions have only been 8% less compared to the amounts exchanged in the same period of last year, meaning that the average price of real estate has been increased in 2020. Additionally, it can be noted that the biggest drop-off has been in the office space market (especially office space exceeding 50 m2) due to the “work from home” regiment most of the employers have adopted, while weekend homes and construction land have seen the biggest increase in the overall market share, especially in the northern parts of Serbia i.e. Vojvodina. The takeaway from the report is that real estate market in the first half of 2020 has been especially strong considering the circumstances, with the biggest indicators of market strength being the fact that 67% of the transactions have been concluded without any form of credit and that residential real estate currently has the highest value per meter square.
Similarly, the Ministry of construction, transport and infrastructure has highlighted the prospects of future investments in the real estate sector. According to official data, there have been issued 10,846 building permits for the first seven months, which is about equal to the number issued in the previous year for the same time period. Of note is that most of the building permits are issued for residential construction where 88.88% of the building permits are issued for buildings with three or more apartments, with the average apartment size of 63,62m2, with certain locations and building types reaching a significantly higher than average value per meter square. Additionally, per official data available the total number of construction sites as of 18th of August is 62,405 (16.000 more than in the same period last year) with most of the construction being completed in capital city of Belgrade, followed by cities of Novi Sad, Subotica and Kragujevac.
It is an insurmountable task to predict what the future will hold, by judging existing patterns and extensively working with clients it the real estate sector we can yet safely affirm our predictions that the COVID-19 pandemic will have minimal impact on the future prospects of the real estate market in Serbia. A contributing factor to this is that the population is being more and more financially empowered to conduct individual purchases and real estate is seen as a perfect investment and savings opportunity which is in turn followed by naturally rising real estate prices in hopes of reaching the European standard.
For any additional questions regarding this topic, please follow our announcements and/or contact attorney at law Nikola Šiljegović, nikola.siljegovic@zslaw.rs or your regular contact at the Zivkovic Samardzic law office.
- Published in Insights
The Decree on replacement travels – protection for passengers or travel agencies

On April 30th, the Ministry of Trade, Tourism and Telecommunications announced on its website that on that day’s session the Government of the Republic of Serbia adopted the Decree on the offer of a replacement travel for tourist travel which was canceled or not realized due to the COVID-19 virus.
As stated on the website of the Ministry, the aforementioned Decree enables all citizens who have paid the tourist arrangement by March 15th of this year to have the opportunity to arrange a replacement travel with the agencies, which they can use by December 31st 2021. at the latest.
If the replacement travel isn’t realized by that date, citizens will be entitled to a refund until January 15th 2022.
Depending on the arrangement of the agency and the passenger, the new travel can be realized for the same or another destination, in the amount not less than that which the passenger paid to the agency for the travel which he did not use.
The conclusion of a new travel agreement between the agency and the passenger will be provided by insurance policies.
It could be heard earlier that the State renderd this Decree in order to protect about 500 thousand people who paid their arrangements by March 15th in every way.
Whether this really is the case, or the agencies are actually protected at the expense of the passengers in this way, remains to be seen.
First of all, the content of this Decree does not imply that passengers will be able to arrange a replacement travel with the agencies, but this possibility has been given to the agencies which are able to offer a replacement travel for unrealized tourist travel, paid in full, or in part, by March 15th 2020, irrespective of the period of realization, which is canceled or unrealized during the state of emergency or later, due to circumstances caused by COVID-19 disease induced by SARS-CoV-2 virus. Therefore, if the agencies do not offer replacement travels, passengers are left without this option. It is interesting that the deadline for the agencies to submit this offer is not prescribed by this Decree.
The passengers are given the possibility to accept or decline the replacement offer.
If they accept, a new agreement on the travel organization is concluded, which also includes the number of the issued guarantee of travel in case of insolvency, and for compensation of damages (which is also included in the existing agreement, which is reversed, according to the Decree). The replacement travel can be realized until December 31st 2021.
On the other hand, if the passenger declines the offer, the agency is obliged to make a refund within 14 days of the expiry of the deadline from the previous paragraph, ie by January 14th 2022. (not January 15th, as stated on the website of the Ministry).
In other words, if the agencies offer a replacement travel, passengers will be able to accept it or decline it, in which case they will have to wait at least 18 months for a refund of the paid amount, when they should be repaid in RSD with no interest. As all arrangements are also paid in RSD equivalent, passengers will be refunded an amount equal to the paid, not revalued amount, which, due to inflation or weakening of the national currency, could be negative for the passengers.
In order to give an answer to the question from the beginning of this text, it is necessary to perceive the situation in which passengers would have found themselves if this Decree had not been rendered. In that case, the general mode of Article 877. of the Law on Obligations would be applied, which stipulates that a passenger can withdraw from an agreement at any time, in whole or in part (paragraph 1), that if the passenger withdraws from the agreement within a reasonable time, determined by the nature of the arrangement (cancellation on a timely basis) the tour operator is only entitled to compensation for administrative costs (paragraph 2), or that in the event of untimely cancellation of the agreement, the tour operator may require the passenger to pay a certain percentage of the agreed upon price determined in proportion to the time remaining until the start of the travel, and which must be economically justified (paragraph 3).
Instead of conclusion: if this Decree passes the assessment of constitutionality and legality (besides the disputed issues related to the restriction of passengers’ property rights, there is also the issue of prohibition of the retroactive enforcement of laws and other general acts), it seems that it was adopted in order to protect travel agencies while the passengers remain in the same (if they accept the offer for a replacement travel which could have been obtained without a Decree, by simple agreement of the contracting parties) or worse situation (if they do not accept the offer they must wait at least 18 months for the refund of the RSD amount of the paid arrangement without interest with all the risks of billing which exist at this time).
For any additional questions regarding this topic, please follow our announcements and/or contact attorney at law Ivan Ljubisavljevic ivan.ljubisavljevic@zslaw.rs or your regular contact at the Zivkovic Samardzic law office.
Uredba o zamenskim putovanjima – zaštita za putnike ili turističke agencije
30. aprila na sajtu Ministarstva trgovine, turizma i telekomunikacije objavljeno je da je na sednici Vlade Republike Srbije tog dana usvojena Uredba o ponudi zamenskog putovanja za turističko putovanje koje je otkazano ili nije realizovano usled bolesti Covid 19.
Kako se navodi na sajtu Ministarstva, pomenutom uredbom omogućeno je da svi građani koji su uplatili turistički aranžman do 15. marta ove godine, imaju mogućnost da sa agencijama dogovore zamensko putovanje koje mogu da iskoriste najkasnije do 31. decembra 2021. godine.
Ukoliko zamensko putovanje ne bude realizovano do pomenutog datuma, građani imaju pravo na povraćaj uplaćenih sredstava do 15. januara 2022. godine.
Novo putovanje se u dogovoru agencije i putnika može realizovati na istoj ili drugoj destinaciji i to u iznosu ne manjem od onog koji je putnik uplatio agenciji za putovanje koje nije iskoristio.
Zaključivanje novog ugovora o putovanju između agencije i putnika će biti obezbeđeno polisama osiguranja.
Ranije se moglo čuti da ovom uredbom država na svaki način želi da zaštiti oko 500 hiljada ljudi koji su do 15. marta uplatili svoje aranžmane.
Da li je to zaista tako ili se na ovaj način zapravo štite agencije nauštrb putnika ostaje da se vidi.
Pre svega, iz sadržine uredbe ne proizlazi da će putnici imati mogućnost da sa agencijama dogovore zamensko putovanje već je ova mogućnost data agencijama koje mogu ponuditi zamensko putovanje za nerealizovano turističko putovanje koje je u celosti ili delimično uplaćeno zaključno sa 15. martom 2020. godine, bez obzira na period realizacije, a koje je otkazano ili nerealizovano u periodu vanrednog stanja ili kasnije usled okolnosti koje su prouzrokovane bolešću COVID-19 izazvane virusom SARS-CoV-2. Dakle, ukoliko agecnije ne ponude zamensko putovanja, putnici ostaju bez ove mogućnosti. Interesantno je da uredbnom nije ostavljen rok u kojem bi agencije trebale da dostave ovu ponudu.
Ono što je putnicima dato jeste mogućnost da prihvate ili ne prihvate zamensku ponudu.
Ukoliko prihvate, zaključuje se novi ugovor o organizovanju putovanja koji sadrži i broj izdate garancije putovanja za slučaj insolventnosti i radi naknade štete (što inače sadrži i postojeći ugovor koji se kako uredba kaže stornira). Zamensko putovanje moguće je realizovati do 31.12.2021. godine.
Sa druge strane, ukoliko putnik ne prihvati ponudu, agencija je dužna da izvrši povraćaj uplaćenih sredstava u roku od 14 dana od isteka roka iz prethodnog stava, dakle do 14. januara 2022. godine (a ne 15. januara kako se na sajtu Ministarstva navodi).
Drugim rečima, ukoliko agencije ponude zamensko putovanje putnici će moći da isto prihvate ili ne u kom slučaju će za povraćaj uplaćenog iznosa morati da sačekaju najmanje 18 meseci kada bi trebalo da im bude vraćen dinarski iznos uplaćenog aranžmana bez kamate. Budući da su svi aranžmani plaćeni i dinarskoj protivvrednosti, putnicima će biti vraćen iznos koji odgovara uplaćenom, a ne revalorizovanom iznosu, što usled inflacije ili slabljenje nacionalne valute može biti negativno po putnike.
Da bi se mogao dati odgovor na pitanje sa početka ovog teksta, potrebno je sagledati situaciju u kojoj bi se putnici našli da ova uredba nije doneta. U tom slučaju, na odnos putnika i agencije primenjivao bi se opšti režim iz čl. 877 Zakona o obligacionom odnosu kojim je propisano da putnik može u svakom trenutku odustati od ugovora, potpuno ili delimično (st. 1), da ako putnik pre početka putovanja odustane od ugovora u razumnom roku koji se određuje s obzirom na vrstu aranžmana (blagovremeni odustanak), organizator putovanja ima pravo samo na naknadu administrativnih troškova (st. 2) odnosno da u slučaju neblagovremenog odustanka od ugovora, organizator putovanja može od putnika zahtevati naknadu u određenom procentu ugovorene cene koji se utvrđuje srazmerno vremenu preostalom do početka putovanja i koji mora biti ekonomski opravdan (st. 3).
Umesto zaključka: ukoliko predmetna uredba prođe ocenu ustavnosti i zakonitosti (pored spornih pitanja koji se odnose na ograničavanja imovinskih prava putnika, tu je i pitanje zabrane povratnog dejstva zakona i drugih opštih akata), stiče se utisak da je ista doneta sa ciljem zaštite turističkih agencija dok su putnici u istoj (ukoliko prihvate ponudu za zamensko putovanje do kojeg je moglo doći i bez uredbe, prostim dogovorom ugovornih strana) ili lošijoj situaciju (ukoliko ne prihvate ponudu moraju da čekaju najmanje 18 mesec za povraćaj dinarskog iznosa uplaćenog aranžmana bez kamate sa svim rizicima naplate koji postoje i u ovom trenutku). Ako imate pitanja u vezi sa ovom temom, pratite naše objave i/ili kontaktirajte adv Ivana Ljubisavljevića ivan.ljubisavljevic@zslaw.rs ili Vašu osobu za redovan kontakt u advokatskoj kancelariji Živković Samardžić.
- Published in Insights
Astroturfing Serbian way, just when we thought we’d seen it all …

Photo by Adrian Curiel on Unsplash
Astroturfing – the deceptive practice of presenting an orchestrated public relations campaign in the guise of unsolicited comments from members of the public, has reached its new height in the letters to the editor section of “Politika”, Serbia’s newspaper of record. (more…)
- Published in Insights
Shift in case-law related to appropriation of encumbered real property
[vc_row][vc_column width=”1/2″][vc_column_text]The 2005 Serbian Law on Hypothec (Official Gazette of the Republic of Serbia, No. 60/2005), introduced the possibility of out-of-court collection and in particular the so-called ‘subsequent agreements’, allowing appropriation of encumbered real property instead of satisfaction of secured claim (Article 27 of the Law on Hypothec), but had its flaws that were severely exposed by the case law.
Subsequent agreement is an agreement entered into between the hypothecary creditor and the owner of the encumbered real property, that may provide for the appropriation of encumbered real property by the hypothecary creditor instead of satisfaction of secured claim. Such agreement, reads the law, is allowed once the secured claim matures and should be assembled in the form of an authentic instrument (notarial act) or the authenticated private deed.
However, even though the intent of the legislature was to allow for the swift and effective satisfaction of secured claims, appropriation of encumbered real property, as well as any other form of out-of-court enforcement of hypothec, was made practically inoperative through an inadequate wording of the law itself and subsequent judicial interpretations of such wording.
Prior to the statutory changes of 2015, the lower ranking hypothecs remained existing even after the out-of-court enforcement was carried through. This applied to subsequent agreements, as well. In accordance with the judicial interpretations of both first instance and appellate courts, the lower ranking hypothec remained existing, since subsequent agreement concluded between the creditor whose claim was secured by the prior ranking hypothec and the owner of the encumbered real property were considered to be res inter alios acta, hence incapable to affect adversely the rights of the creditor whose claim was secured by the lower ranking hypothec and who was not a party to such contract.[/vc_column_text][/vc_column][vc_column width=”1/2″][vc_column_text]
This all created a paradox: instead of satisfying claim by the appropriation of encumbered real property, the appropriating creditor whose claim was secured by the prior ranking hypothec got him-self compelled to substitute in the place of the encumbered real property owner.
While the issue was resolved by the statutory changes of 2015, for a significant number of cases that took place before the changes, decision of the Supreme Court of Cassation of Serbia No. Prev. 194/2015 in AIK Banka v. Agrobanka in bankruptcy case, reported here earlier, may provide a breakthrough. In that particular case, the Supreme Court of Cassation held, for the first time, that the rights of lower ranking hypothecary creditors remain reserved only to the extent the value of appropriated real property exceeds the claim secured by the prior ranking hypothec (hypothec of the appropriating creditor). If, on the other hand, the value of appropriated real property falls short of the claim secured by the prior ranking hypothec, or is equal to it, the appropriating creditor should be entitled to request the remaining lower ranking hypothecs to be extinguished and erased.
If you have any questions regarding the above, please contact Živković Samardžić Dispute Resolution Associate Ivan Ljubisavljević (ivan.ljubisavljevic@zslaw.rs), or any of your regular contacts at Živković Samardžić. In preparing this insight, Ivan was assisted by Danica Vlaović, trainee attorney at law.[/vc_column_text][/vc_column][/vc_row][vc_row][vc_column][vc_column_text]
Click here to read this insight in Serbian.
[/vc_column_text][/vc_column][/vc_row]
- Published in Insights
The Supreme Court of Cassation sets an arena for the confrontation between the lawyers and the notaries
[vc_row][vc_column width=”1/2″][vc_column_text]An issue of whether a real estate purchase agreement assembled by the notary as an authentic instrument (notarial act) is a form valid for the inscription of ownership into the real estate cadastre in Serbia, became the matter of dissagreement among the legal professionals after the recent rulling of the Supreme Court of Cassation.
The Civil Department of the Supreme Court of Cassation, at its session held on 25 October 2016, gave the following ruling thereon:
„in case of an authentic instrument, a public notary as a professional enjoing public trust is drawing the legal document, satisfying himself of the identity of the parties, explaining rigorously the implications of the instrument, thus generating higher level of trust comparing to the mere authentication of an agreement. Parties are free, in accordance with the principle of autonomy of will (‘autonomie de la volonté’), to opt, with regards to the form of the contract, for more than a mere minimum of formal requirements. There’s no harm in doing so, neither to the public, nor to the private interests.Form is not a goal in itself. If the formal requirements are interpreted systematically and teleologically, it is clear that an authentic instrument is valid for the inscription of ownership into the real estate cadastre and that a public register (cadastre) may not dismiss or reject the request for inscription solely due to such presumed ‘shortcoming’.”
In other words, the Supreme Court of Cassation held that since additional or more strict formal requirements consume fewer or less strict formal requirements, the contract that in accordance with the law must be concluded in the form of an authenticated private deed, should also be valid if concluded in the form of an authentic instrument.
The form of an authentic instrument as a form required for a real estate purchase agreement was introduced to the Serbian legal system with the 2013 Ammendments to the Law on the Notariate. The ammendments provided that the real estate purchase agreements were to be completely assembled by notaries, thus carving the legal work related to such agreements out of the scope of legal assistance provided by the lawyers – members of the Bar Associaton.
Not so long after the Ammendments to the Law on the Notariate, the members of the Bar went on strike that frozen almost all administration of justice in Serbia and lasted more than four months. The strike was called off only after the government accepted to table the new Ammendments to the Law on the Notariate to the Parliament, that would erese the real estate purchase agreements from the list of agreements for which the form of an authentic instrument was required.[/vc_column_text][/vc_column][vc_column width=”1/2″][vc_single_image image=”5490″ img_size=”full”][vc_column_text]Two years after the compromise that ended the strike, the rulling of the Supreme Court of Cassation may renew the conflict between the licensed legal professions, lawyers and notaries.
The Bar and its memebers are mostly at the position that a real estate purchase agreement assembled by the notary as an authentic instrument is not a valid form for the inscription of ownership into the real estate cadastre. Their arguments are based on the Real Estate Transfer Act, general principles of the State Survey and Cadastre Act, as well as on the fact that erasing the real estate purchase agreements from the list of agreements for which the form of an authentic instrument in the Ammended Law on the Notariate, was a compromise accepted by both lawyers and notaries. The same line of arguments led number of cadastral administrations to their decisions dismissing requests for the inscription of ownership into the real estate cadastre based on the authentic instruments.
On the other hand, the position of the Supreme Court of Cassation, besides its sound theoretical basis, appears to be pragmatic as well. There appaers to be a significant number of the real estate purchase agreements assembled by notaries as authentic instruments, and those who have opted for such form will now be in position to inscribe their ownership into the real estate cadastre.
However, while the ruling of the Supreme Court of Cassation solves an issue of importance for the judiciary and the administration and upholds the legal certainty, it does create a new confrontation arena for the lawyers and the notaries. This is even more the case after the Bar Association of Serbia required the Supreme Court of Cassation to set aside its own ruling, under the threat of another strike.
If you have any questions regarding the above, please contact Živković Samardžić Dispute Resolution Associate Jovan Pjevač (jovan.pjevac@zslaw.rs), or any of your regular contacts at Živković Samardžić. In preparing this insight, Jovan was assisted by Tihomir Vlaović, trainee attorney at law.[/vc_column_text][/vc_column][/vc_row]
- Published in Insights
- 1
- 2